psyche101, on 01 March 2012 - 04:54 AM, said:
I do not think that is the fault of NASA, but the allocation of funds, we know the Apollo missions were cut due to lack of public interest.
No, political interest. We'd won the race for the Moon. Meanwhile the Soviet Union was moving quickly with several orbital launches every year and a pre-Mir space station. This was the new space race which we had to win or the world would think we're dummies. The funds for Apollo missions were diverted to the Space Shuttle program and the last Saturn was launched to create Space Lab as a place for the Shuttle to fly to and maintain its orbit. Since the Shuttle was going to be in orbit by 1978 (it was trivial compared to traveling to the Moon), we didn't have to worry about the Space Lab's low orbit decaying.
Quote
I don't, I have had many enjoyable conversations about Kepler, Cassini and Hubble. They had a big explosion last year when they crashed LCross into the moon, but the Mars Rovers still sem to garner more interest.
I don't know what nerds you hang out with but they are not regular American taxpayers who enjoyed Space Shuttle launches on television having no idea why we were launching a Space Shuttle. No one knows what Kepler is. Some might have heard of Cassini.