34 replies to this topic

[The Silver Thong]

Alex Jones seems to forget that the top 2 percent cant live with out the bottom 98 percent.   How would the top 2 percent deffend against such a number.  One day it will explode but not in a full scale nuke war. It would not serve those that one thinks. Who will farm who will maintain power who will polish there boats who will take care of health care.  The top policy makers and yes I mean above the president of any counrty destroys what they need to survive will not happen.  Nuclear weapons are so 1960 it`s pathetic. they mean nothing now as if used on a ww3 scale is pointless. A rouge nation might use one but that would hadled very quickly.  For example Iran uses one NK uses one Russia will not back those actions so to think so is silly.

The threat is a rouge nuke and we know is will not spark a 3rd ww

[Corp]

and then, on 05 December 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:

I remember a quote where a Frenchman said there could be no war in 1914 since there just wasn't money for it.  Quaint thinking never seems to go away where irrational behavior is concerned.

In 1914 everyone was looking forward to war, especially the French. The annoucement was met by cheering crowds. Not the same situation these days.

Muzzybluezzy, on 06 December 2012 - 03:55 AM, said:

Corp,

Today we have a global crisis and before two world wars occurred because of global crisis.
Here I want to mention some about first part of the world war series (I believe the world wars are plannings of global elite, hence I used expression of "the world war series"anyway). Beginning from nineteenth century owners of this pathetic world order planned unnamed a global crisis and regional wars (ottoman vs tsardom of Russia and so on) during that period they created "the nation spring" to destroy empires, provoked ethnic groups (in popular saying "public(s)" or "nation(s)" )to attack empires, initiated civil wars and started the first world war in the early part of twentieth century. When the First World War finished, soldier losses of Allied Powers were 5,525,000 and soldier losses of Central Powers were 4,386,000. Somehow Central Powers were on losing side and more importantly there was not any empire among winner Allied Powers. It was some kinda weird end of the war. Frankly it's like I almost told you what first world war adventure is.

I'm sorry Muzzy but you need to read up on the end of the First World War. The British and French were Allied Powers and they still had their empires after the war. In fact their empires expanded. Portugal, Belgium, Holland, Italy, Japan...they all had intact empires by the end of the war. The empires that ended were the Russian, German, Ottoman, and Austro-Hungarian empires, all who lost in the war. Their empires were broken up so they wouldn't be able to challenege the Allied Powers, which isn't an odd ending to a war at all. In fact it's business as usual. Also loses do not give the whole story of how a war went. Many of the Allied loses were suffered by the Russians, who the Germans beat like a drum. However where the Central Powers lost the war was on the Western Front, not the Eastern. A quick brose through the Wiki page should be able to tell you why and how the Central Powers lost the war.

So if the goal of the First World War was to end empires it failed.

Quote

I don't want to mention the process of the Second World War. Because in the second world war the effect of global crisis is clear enough (the great depression). But I'd like you to know that the second world war was the project of selling weapon to escape from global crisis (this is why Hitler was determined to work up the angry).

The Second World War was a combination of the Great Depression and the peace terms placed on Germany after the First World War. With hindsight it's pretty clear that another war was just a matter of time, especially once strong nationalist parties were elected. Selling weapons had next to nothing to do with it. I'm sure weapon companies were more than happy to take advantage of the situation, but setting up the situation in the first place? No.

Quote

Today we have a global crisis yet again and this time we have an arab spring (due to they want to start a middle east based world war). You might disagree with me about those,
in fact, let's see what time says in future about it.

The Middle East has been a potential conflict point long before the Arab Spring. It's possible a serious war might break out there, but I don't think it will be from the hand of some shadow organization.

Quote

Alex Jones is the man! he is one of my absolute two favorite famous Texans (the other one is zz top, I got inspired by beards for my nickname ).

He is a lion-hearted man against fat cats.

Sorry but Alex Jones just pushes conspiracy theories, some of which are truly insane. He uses people's paranoia to make money.

Edited by Corp, 06 December 2012 - 04:57 PM.

[keithisco]

MichaelW, on 02 December 2012 - 09:49 PM, said:

If it comes to that rock and a hard place Israel will go nuclear against Damascus and Iran. Then if pressed by the world community Israel will and does have a plan to attack any. This includes EU, the United States, Russia and China. If we don't stop Iran and force Israel into a go it alone situation then everyone will regret it and it will go nuclear before it is over.

The "PLAN" is obviously not worth a "Rats ***" . Israel, would not even be able to launch anything against the Nuclear Powers because such attempts would be IMMEDIATELY detected and neutralised - this is the way to self - imposed Genocide, and ignorance is the path towards it. Why on earth should Western Powers even consider backing up a psycopathic Israel??

[Muzzybluezzy]

The Silver Thong, on 06 December 2012 - 04:31 AM, said:

Alex Jones seems to forget that the top 2 percent cant live with out the bottom 98 percent.   How would the top 2 percent deffend against such a number.  

Alex Jones is not a post-modern Jesus (or our savior), for sure he might have some mistakes (inattentions, wrong thoughts and so on)
how many protester celebrities are there like him?

Corp, on 06 December 2012 - 04:55 PM, said:

Sorry but Alex Jones just pushes conspiracy theories, some of which are truly insane. He uses people's paranoia to make money.

Alex Jones, Alex Constantine, David Icke, William Cooper(R.I.P), and Phil Schneider(R.I.P),
to me all of these names are precious! People should hear and find out them. In fact, in comparison with them I have different minds but I'm in substantial agreement with them, and I try to follow or read them/or their articles)

Corp, on 06 December 2012 - 04:55 PM, said:

I'm sorry Muzzy but you need to read up on the end of the First World War. The British and French were Allied Powers and they still had their empires after the war. In fact their empires expanded. Portugal, Belgium, Holland, Italy, Japan...they all had intact empires by the end of the war. The empires that ended were the Russian, German, Ottoman, and Austro-Hungarian empires, all who lost in the war. Their empires were broken up so they wouldn't be able to challenege the Allied Powers, which isn't an odd ending to a war at all. In fact it's business as usual. Also loses do not give the whole story of how a war went. Many of the Allied loses were suffered by the Russians, who the Germans beat like a drum. However where the Central Powers lost the war was on the Western Front, not the Eastern. A quick brose through the Wiki page should be able to tell you why and how the Central Powers lost the war. So if the goal of the First World War was to end empires it failed. The Second World War was a combination of the Great Depression and the peace terms placed on Germany after the First World War. With hindsight it's pretty clear that another war was just a matter of time, especially once strong nationalist parties were elected. Selling weapons had next to nothing to do with it. I'm sure weapon companies were more than happy to take advantage of the situation, but setting up the situation in the first place? No. The Middle East has been a potential conflict point long before the Arab Spring. It's possible a serious war might break out there, but I don't think it will be from the hand of some shadow organization.

before the first world war global dominant powers could not describe a definition as global crisis because people did not have such a perception, additionally, today it is known clearly by some that a strong worldwide economic depression created conditions of the first world war. You should not trust fag expressions of policy or history, if you trust those, you suppose as if historical and political heroes are not slave for anyone or anything (that's a big hoax!). You should try to see as a whole... Worldly fat cats deceive us through history, political science and sociology.. and so on. Those are the confusion tools that are exploited by them. In order that people don't use their own head, all those are warped to confuse intellectualists. Actually science always serves the profits of global capitalism (instead of benefits of people. Blocking different thoughts and information sources, producing atom bombs, making lethal weapons, creating mutant soldiers and so on)

Their world order was built into lies and frauds, for instance,

Back in the day throughout the period of cold war Islam never was threat morever
Osama Bin Laden was a peaceful muslim hero




After the soviet union fell somehow the religion of Islam and Osama Bin Laden became bloody savage terrorists.





how the hell did that happen?
dirtbag fags fool us, cut the bull****!

and lastly;
after first world war worldly fat cats and reptilian allies begat nation-states, along with the Second World War they aimed to heat up the economy and firmed up the national consciousness, and today, by way of third world war this alliance want to cap off  all states on the world, thanks to this, without being states they will found a world government/order that is just dependent on themselves (its details are here: "..the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries..")


to my mind such a thing (something like they planned) never will come true...

That's all I wanted to say about this topic.


regards.
muzzybluezzy

Edited by Muzzybluezzy, 06 December 2012 - 11:11 PM.

[Corp]

Reptilian aliens? Right...I think I'll stick with historical facts than paranoid theories with zero basis in reality.