Jump to content


- - - - -

Activists to boycott "The Grey" movie


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#16    ~TheBigK~

~TheBigK~

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,896 posts
  • Joined:13 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:47 AM

View PostParanoid Android, on 26 February 2012 - 02:31 AM, said:

Regarding the film I can't say that I planned on watching it in the first place, but it's just a movie. I don't care if it gives a wrong impression about wolves. It's not a documentary. Plenty of films misrepresent things. Next thing I know clown lovers are going to demand a boycott of killer clown movies because they misrepresent clowns.
I do agree that it is just a movie and my love for Liam Neeson almost makes me want to sit through it, but that probably won't happen ever. It just bothers me that there are plenty of people who are going to think it's an accurate representation of wolves. I remember when Apollo 18 came out half the board was in an uproar because they thought it would demean the accomplishments of astronauts, would make kids not want to dream of becoming astronauts, and think that it was a true story of a moon landing. That was just a movie too but people got upset. I personally don't have a problem with this kind of stuff because it's just entertainment. Same with The Grey. I just hope most people are intelligent enough to realize that it is just a movie, merely entertainment. Unfortunately, a lot of people are stupid.
Posted Image

#17    Sakari

Sakari

    Just Me

  • Member
  • 9,577 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Langlois,Oregon

  • Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:49 AM

View PostParanoid Android, on 26 February 2012 - 02:31 AM, said:

Regarding the film I can't say that I planned on watching it in the first place, but it's just a movie. I don't care if it gives a wrong impression about wolves. It's not a documentary. Plenty of films misrepresent things. Next thing I know clown lovers are going to demand a boycott of killer clown movies because they misrepresent clowns.



Yes, it is just a movie.....And I do not want it to make any money......Nor do I want people to think the portrayal of wolves in the movie is accurate ( and people will )......I doubt people are going to go out and shoot clowns, I think even you know that was no comparison........There are people fighting to save the wolves right now, and trying to gather support, and fighting Congress also.This is where the public needs to help, and a movie like this " educating " people does not help one bit.

I am a little more pissed about the actors in the movie eating a wolf to " get into their role "......




Jaws was also just a movie.....And the shark killing sky rocketed, and it took over a decade to get most people back to reality about sharks.





Quote


1975 was the year the White Shark became 'Great' and all sharks acquired an internationally recognized musical theme. More than any other event, the movie
JAWS revolutionized the public's conception of sharks. Whether they recognize it or not, just about every scrap of scaffolding underlying 'common knowledge' about sharks comes from that one, 25-year-old film. Who, at the time, could have known that the world's first Summer Blockbuster would so powerfully transform popular culture?

From today's perspective, the world of 1975 seems like a distant, simpler, and less stressful place. Sure, the World at large - and America, too - had its problems, but at least children didn't shoot one another in the schoolyard. And if anyone thought about sharks at all, it was usually a flickering idle fancy quickly banished by the reassuring belief that the truly dangerous ones were always 'somewhere else'.
JAWS changed all that, transforming sharks in general - and Great Whites in particular - into sea-going homicidal maniacs lurking just out of sight off your local beach, ready to shred your very own personal body into strips of bloody flesh or to simply gobble you whole. Unlike previous monster movies, there were no reassuring laughs after the shudders. These aquatic 'monsters' were very real and they could strike in the most ordinary and harmless-seeming of places.

In response, legions of macho idiots with a deep and abiding need to  express their manliness through mindless violence, headed to sea to do 'battle'  with sharks. But rather than meet sharks on their own terms, these yobbos  (generally financially well-off and often pissed as newts) picked their fights from the safety of state-of-the-art craft armed with rods, harpoons, guns and explosives.  Thousands upon thousands of sharks were slaughtered, mostly small, inoffensive species that were about as dangerous as kittens or those ridiculously dull, blunt-ended scissors they give kindergarten students.  But, as the absolute 'baddest' of the 'bad-ass' sharks, the Great White was  sought out in particular. Unknown numbers of these relatively uncommon sharks were  tortured and killed, their jaws and teeth ripped out as grotesque 'trophies' and  the remainder of the carcasses unceremoniously discarded. Such behavior is a disgusting waste of wildlife and helped make the already scarce White  Shark even more scarce.

In these kinder, gentler, more ecologically-sensitive times,  JAWS has been strongly condemned as the impetus for the shark slaughtering obscenities of the past and the disconcerting scarcity of White Sharks in the present. Even Peter Benchley, whose 1973 novel  JAWS gave rise to the film of the same name, has repeatedly expressed regret that something he wrote resulted in the needless slaughter of so many sharks.

http://www.elasmo-re...econsidered.htm

Our Wolf, Sakari's Memorial Page


http://petsupports.com/a04/sakari.htm


#18    katzemacht

katzemacht

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 456 posts
  • Joined:10 Feb 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:up a tree

Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:58 AM

I admire wolves too much to waste money seeing this.  
Wolves choose their mate and raise their families for life and mourn when a death occurs.  The intelligence of such animals should set an example of how much they have compassion for each other.  Wolves deserve to survive!

Posted Image
Posted Image
Jaguars don't have time to wait~
http://action.biolog...action_KEY=1680

Jaguar

#19    katzemacht

katzemacht

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 456 posts
  • Joined:10 Feb 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:up a tree

Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:50 PM

http://www.nywolf.org/images/Howl.wav
Posted Image
Jaguars don't have time to wait~
http://action.biolog...action_KEY=1680

Jaguar

#20    __Kratos__

__Kratos__

    -Staring-

  • Member
  • 25,876 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside the moon

  • As darkness falls, night unfolds ebony wings to wrap the world in it's dark embrace.

Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:31 PM

I don't agree with killing wolves but these wolves were already dead and were bought from a hunter from what I understand. Everything on screen is special effects.

Plus the movie is pretty amazing. I saw it opening night thinking it was just going to be Liam Neeson going to war with wolves (because that's all the commercials showed) and it wasn't... It's about the human will. A pretty dark film what I wasn't looking for that night but walked away afterwards glad I saw it. So the wolves aren't even the main theme, they're just there as a catalyst.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." ~Philip K. Dick

"Passion, peace. Strength, knowledge. Power, serenity. Victory, harmony. Freedom, the Force." ~Ashara Zavros

#21    Oppono Astos

Oppono Astos

    Overlord of Delgon

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,701 posts
  • Joined:06 Jan 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beyond your dimension

Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:32 PM

View Postkeithisco, on 25 February 2012 - 07:08 PM, said:

The last Wolf in the UK was killed in the 17th century in Weymouth.

I applaud this becuse at that time wolves were little scared of Humans and accounted for the disappearance of many children. These are wild creatures without compassion and need to be restricted to specific areas.

Confine them to wild life preserves, where they can longer prey on our children - that is fine.Nobody in their right mind would want them re - introduced into populated areas.

Wolf is probably no more "Gamey" than Deer, are you also going to get on your High Horse to say that eating venison is also disgusting?
Well, you start off with an erroneous fact, and then spout age-old myth and paranoia - and fairy tales...  Precisely what's wrong with this movie.

I have been fortunate enough to be part of (captive) wolf packs, and helped hand raise cubs; they were wonderful friends with who we had total mutual respect, trust and affection.  

In the wild the wolf need be far more afraid of humans than humans need be of wolves - humans kill wolves for sport and 'fun'.
Who is the skeptic: the realist who won't accept belief, or the believer who won't accept reality?

#22    Matt121

Matt121

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 745 posts
  • Joined:17 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:06 AM

People eat animals it's what we do, it's what we were built to do, what's the big problem? I don't get it with these moron activists. The movie looks like a good adventure film.

#23    Paranoid Android

Paranoid Android

    ????????

  • 22,172 posts
  • Joined:17 Apr 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney

  • Paranoid Android..... I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will End you!

Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:23 AM

View PostSakari, on 26 February 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:

Yes, it is just a movie.....And I do not want it to make any money......Nor do I want people to think the portrayal of wolves in the movie is accurate ( and people will )......I doubt people are going to go out and shoot clowns, I think even you know that was no comparison..
My solution would be to simply outlaw recreational hunting, period full stop. That way, regardless of the film no one could hunt them just for the heck of it.
Posted Image

A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion
~ Ancient Hebrew proverb

#24    Sakari

Sakari

    Just Me

  • Member
  • 9,577 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Langlois,Oregon

  • Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:47 AM

View PostParanoid Android, on 27 February 2012 - 05:23 AM, said:

My solution would be to simply outlaw recreational hunting, period full stop. That way, regardless of the film no one could hunt them just for the heck of it.



That is trying to be done..( Hunting Wolves )...And as said, without the support of the public, it has little chance of happening......That was my point, previously posted above.

View PostMatt121, on 27 February 2012 - 05:06 AM, said:

People eat animals it's what we do, it's what we were built to do, what's the big problem? I don't get it with these moron activists. The movie looks like a good adventure film.



Ignorance is bliss..........

Our Wolf, Sakari's Memorial Page


http://petsupports.com/a04/sakari.htm


#25    Matt121

Matt121

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 745 posts
  • Joined:17 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:45 AM

View PostSakari, on 27 February 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:

That is trying to be done..( Hunting Wolves )...And as said, without the support of the public, it has little chance of happening......That was my point, previously posted above.





Ignorance is bliss..........

it's not ignorance humans are animals and we've been eating other animals for millions of years how is eating a wolf any different than eating a cow or a pig?

#26    unit

unit

    tinfoil

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,343 posts
  • Joined:12 Sep 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:down under

Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:07 PM

Quote

As far as the movie goes, it`s a movie.
there is no such thing as a 'movie' made simply for the sake of being a 'movie'

ok, so when the wolves are all killed off, we can start culling off the big bad human then, right?

be warned, we reap what we sow.
My contribution is deciding how giant mutant space goats travel in space.
Newton's Second Law: For every action there is a equal and opposite reaction. They fart themselves around.

#27    Sakari

Sakari

    Just Me

  • Member
  • 9,577 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Langlois,Oregon

  • Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Posted 07 March 2012 - 06:09 PM

View PostMatt121, on 27 February 2012 - 08:45 AM, said:

it's not ignorance humans are animals and we've been eating other animals for millions of years how is eating a wolf any different than eating a cow or a pig?

Matt, you just do not get it...

Go study the " re-introduction " of Wolves ( because we whiped them out once ), than study the " population control ".......It has nothing to do with eating them, this is the first I have heard of that.They are being shot, killed, to " control their populations "......Not to Eat.

As a matter of fact, good old Sarah Palin signed a piece of paper in Alaska where " hunters " ( no they are not ) get $50.00 for each right paw brought in.

Until you educate yourself on this, I will continue to say you are ignorant on this topic.....Just as your comments are showing, is the reason I posted it.









Our Wolf, Sakari's Memorial Page


http://petsupports.com/a04/sakari.htm


#28    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,427 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 07 March 2012 - 09:32 PM

BigK and Sakari - I'd be interested in your take on the following.

A Monstertalk podcast on the death of Kenton Carnegie (http://www.skeptic.c...rtalk/11/10/05/) where Dr. Valerius Geist makes some pretty strong claims as to the dangers wolves pose to humans.  It has been a few months since I listened to it, but I seem to recall that his argument is that we're not really seeing the true nature of wild wolves at this point in their reintroduction and that it is entirely possible that they will eventually revert to the ways of their predecessors.

Here's a little research piece Dr. Geist did on the topic as well:  http://rliv.com/wolf/GeistWhenDangerous.pdf

I'm not arguing one way or the other, but you guys are obviously well educated in this area and I'm just interested in your take.

Edited by Rafterman, 07 March 2012 - 09:35 PM.


#29    Sakari

Sakari

    Just Me

  • Member
  • 9,577 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Langlois,Oregon

  • Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:24 PM

View PostRafterman, on 07 March 2012 - 09:32 PM, said:

BigK and Sakari - I'd be interested in your take on the following.

A Monstertalk podcast on the death of Kenton Carnegie (http://www.skeptic.c...rtalk/11/10/05/) where Dr. Valerius Geist makes some pretty strong claims as to the dangers wolves pose to humans.  It has been a few months since I listened to it, but I seem to recall that his argument is that we're not really seeing the true nature of wild wolves at this point in their reintroduction and that it is entirely possible that they will eventually revert to the ways of their predecessors.

Here's a little research piece Dr. Geist did on the topic as well:  http://rliv.com/wolf...enDangerous.pdf

I'm not arguing one way or the other, but you guys are obviously well educated in this area and I'm just interested in your take.

I will try to have you read a few things, I need to dig them up, but I will try to find a start.......As for Dr. Geist, I disagree with that.

Also, as for the Kenton Carnegie incident..... :

The decision, however, was   controversial because of the   uncertainty surrounding the   evidence and the differing   interpretations of the evidence   by various highly qualified   experts. Consequently, the   actual cause of death remains   the subject of intense debate.



When it comes to Wolves attacking people, no.Not a high danger at all.....This topic will take a long time to get the information out, and to educate people.If you are willing, I am willing to take the time.

You need to study everything about Wolves, how they hunt, what they hunt, their social behavior , their impact on the environment, etc.......My main focus has been more on the people upset about them being back, and saying it is ruining their " hunting of Elk ", etc, etc.....That is a entire debate in itself....And that also takes a lot of studying up.( as in everything, both sides have their websites, and have their " data :"....The hard part is finding out what is true, and what is not.

I will give you a few links to start you off......And this for starters :

Quote

Gray wolves were common in the northern Rocky Mountain states prior to 1870. After bison (Bison
bison), elk (Cervus elaphus), deer (Odocoileus spp.), and other ungulates were decimated by
unregulated hunting and settlement, wolves and other large predators threatened the expanding
livestock industry. By 1930, government predator control programs severely reduced predators and
eliminated wolves from the western U.S.

I can not find any documented data anywhere of Wolves killing Native Americans, or Immigrants that came here....It all stems as said above, once the Wolves started hurting the " livestock industry " they were killed.....Imagine that...........After the re-introduction, they are now being killed again for the same reason, although the Government pays ranchers for any killed livestock from wolves.Also, there are ways to control them without harm, there is a rancher pushing for that.I am trying to find the information on that.....This will take a bit, I am starting my awesome 7 day straight schedule at work.

The Reintroduction
of Gray Wolves to
Yellowstone
National
Park
and
Central
Idaho

http://www.fws.gov/m...lf/EIS_1994.pdf



In North America, no person has ever been killed by a healthy, wild wolf, and attacks are extremely rare. Most wild wolves avoid people, and even people who live in wolf country rarely actually see the animals. In fact, many wolf researchers who have approached wolf dens have found that they were able to do so without being approached by adult wolves.

However, wolf attacks are not unheard of in North America. In the past 25 years, five people have been bitten by wolves in Algonquin park in Ontario, Canada. Two of the more serious attacks happened during the 1990's. The first incident, which occurred in 1996, involved a wolf that bit an 11 year old boy and tried to pull him out of his sleeping bag. In 1998, a wolf grabbed an infant and tossed it before it was driven away. The same wolf had earlier tried to attack a four-year-old girl. In addition, in April, 2000, a six-year-old boy was bitten by a wolf at an Alaskan logging camp, and during the summer of 2000, a camper was bitten by a wolf on Vancouver Island.

All four of these attacks are believed to have been committed by habituated wolves, that is, wolves who had lost their fear of humans. The wolves involved in the Algonquin attacks had been fed and approached by people, and the wolf involved in the Vancouver Island attack had also been fed by people. Some wildlife biologists believe that the behaviour of the wolf involved in the attack on the Alaska boy was consistent with an animal that had been habituated to human food. Wild wolves typically fear people, but wolves who have learned that they can get food by raiding campsites or bothering people may lose their fear of them, and as a result, may begin to behave in an aggressive manner. Wolves who have been repeatedly approached by humans may also begin to lose their fear of them. So, while wolves are generally not dangerous to people, it is important for those who see wolves in the wild to not forget that wolves are no different from any other wild carnivore, and should therefore not be approached or fed.

This phenomenon is, or course, not limited to wolves. Any wild animal that has been fed or repeatedly approached by humans may lose fear of them and become dangerous. It is also important to keep these negative wolf-human encounters within a broader perspective. There are roughly 60 000 wolves in North America and the vast majority of them avoid human contact. Millions of people visit parks and wilderness areas each year that are inhabited by wolves and attacks remain extremely rare.






As said, if there is interest, I can discuss this for months, and would be happy to.Only if there is interest...I have, and do keep myself involved with this in other areas.....


Overall, the greatest threat to wolves is people's fear and  misunderstanding about the species. Many fairy tales and myths tend to  misrepresent wolves as villainous, dangerous creatures.





A good link to start :

http://www.defenders.../wolf,_gray.php

A few good links :

Edited by Sakari, 07 March 2012 - 11:32 PM.

Our Wolf, Sakari's Memorial Page


http://petsupports.com/a04/sakari.htm


#30    danbell06

danbell06

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 299 posts
  • Joined:22 Feb 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

  • A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of five.

Posted 10 March 2012 - 10:45 PM

It's only a film. I doubt any of the wolves were harmed making it. And as for the movie portraying wolves in a bad light, there are a million films that have led the audience to believe that, humans and animals alike, are what they are not.

No big deal.

What are the activists trying to achieve?
:hmm:
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users