BrandOfAmber, on 29 February 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:
I'd just like to point out that a creature such as described here shows many of the criteria believed to be necessary to achieve 'Secondary Intelligence' as a species...
Some background, 'Primary Intelligence' is defined as the basic brainpower required for survival. All species on Earth display primary intelligence. 'Secondary Intelligence' on the other hand, shows cognitive reasoning skills, and advanced conceptual abilities. A creature with Secondary Intelligence could perform a thought experiment, and could design a tool.
Many species on Earth today exhibit secondary intelligence, for example some (non-human) primate species use sticks as tools to 'fish' for ants within trees.
Usually for Secondary Intelligence to be achieved within a species, I've noticed (this is just my personal criteria here...) the following characteristics are either present, or most of them are present in the species:
1) Upright Walking (enabling the development of a larger brain)
2) Binocular Vision (enabling 3D visual perception)
3) Manipulatable Digits (humans have fingers, octopi have arms, etc.)
4) Sufficient Body Mass to support a Large Brain
5) Carnivorous Tendencies (which encourage a 'hunter' mentality, which many scientists believe develops higher brain function for a time during species development)
Not sure on whether or not penguins have binocular vision... (eyes in the front or eyes on the side...) It would seem that side vision would serve them well underwater...
But other than that, the data (in my view) suggests a species here with Secondary Intelligence, now extinct on our Earth. We could have communicated with a creature like that, had it survived. In fact, with 24 million years on us, this Bird could have taught us some things...
-Brand
Hi Brand.
You might be interested in the study on corvid intelligence: there are biologists who put their intelligence inbetween humans and apes.
And about point -1- : upright walking? What about dolphins, killer whales and whales in general? Their brains are equal in size to ours.
Point -5- Carnivorous Tendencies. Personally I think it's opportunists that have more possibilities. Think about this: no prey to hunt, what do you do? You eat roots, eggs, fruit, herbs. What do you do when you are a strict carnivore and your prey had left the area you live in? You starve.