1828 replies to this topic

[DONTEATUS]

Two masses moving at close to Light speed,towards each other will in facto-imunudo, turn quickly into a FTL Burrito worm hole. And find themselfs near the front of the Line of the closest Taco Bell-Ooooo!
And I have the math to prove it !
   2% 300x 42=96:00 over the power of 2x 6000 % of Nuttin !

[shadowlark]

psyche101, on 26 April 2012 - 01:17 AM, said:

My link

Awesome! Thanks for sharing!!

[psyche101]

shadowlark, on 26 April 2012 - 03:32 AM, said:

Awesome! Thanks for sharing!!

You are most welcome, I thought it was pretty impressive too

[psyche101]

DONTEATUS, on 26 April 2012 - 02:50 AM, said:

Two masses moving at close to Light speed,towards each other will in facto-imunudo, turn quickly into a FTL Burrito worm hole. And find themselfs near the front of the Line of the closest Taco Bell-Ooooo!
And I have the math to prove it !
   2% 300x 42=96:00 over the power of 2x 6000 % of Nuttin !

Indeed Big D! The kinetic energy from space collisions is immense, we only need look at the Dinosaurs to see how one rock can affect en entire planet. And we are lucky!! We have the Giants out there Like Uranus, Jupiter and Saturn catching these strays before the can reach us and pummel the earth. Uranus has endured heavy bombardment, not once, but twice! It may be what smashed it from it's regular (or perhaps expected?) tilt.



LINK - Uranus takes a pounding more frequently than thought

The only reliable way to change the tilt of one planet is to smash it with another planet of comparable size. While planets running into other planets isn't something that happens very often nowadays, back in the tempestuous youth of the solar system, it was relatively common: a planet the size of Mars hitting Earth four and a half billion years ago probably blasted off enough stuff to form the moon, for example. But with Uranus, one collision big enough to knock the entire planet sideways would also have screwed up Uranus' system of moons, which isn't the case.

So Uranus did take a pounding, but its moon avoided being screwed up.

It's all very serious stuff!







I'm sorry Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.  

Edited by psyche101, 26 April 2012 - 04:33 AM.

[ShadowSot]

[DONTEATUS]

psyche101, on 26 April 2012 - 04:27 AM, said:

Indeed Big D! The kinetic energy from space collisions is immense, we only need look at the Dinosaurs to see how one rock can affect en entire planet. And we are lucky!! We have the Giants out there Like Uranus, Jupiter and Saturn catching these strays before the can reach us and pummel the earth. Uranus has endured heavy bombardment, not once, but twice! It may be what smashed it from it's regular (or perhaps expected?) tilt.



LINK - Uranus takes a pounding more frequently than thought

The only reliable way to change the tilt of one planet is to smash it with another planet of comparable size. While planets running into other planets isn't something that happens very often nowadays, back in the tempestuous youth of the solar system, it was relatively common: a planet the size of Mars hitting Earth four and a half billion years ago probably blasted off enough stuff to form the moon, for example. But with Uranus, one collision big enough to knock the entire planet sideways would also have screwed up Uranus' system of moons, which isn't the case.

So Uranus did take a pounding, but its moon avoided being screwed up.

It's all very serious stuff!







I'm sorry Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.  

I just watched a H2 channel show about the possibility of Nimisiss or what ever our Dark Sister Sun out there in Deep Space  would do to the Earth in 10 million years when Its supposed to return? WHere do these guys get this stuff ?
Anywho ! It would just about vaporize our world. Did I miss the part where we were supposed to be around in 10 million years?
WEll I know that astro-psisyicist have a way with there math and such. Good thing Im more Into Rolls Royce, Food and Sex ! What elese is there ?
Keep me Honest !
ANd for sure Keep looking Up you never know when sumptin will fall on you !

Attached Files

•  ArbjP_BCIAAkJYw.jpg   138.37K   14 downloads

[psyche101]

DONTEATUS, on 27 April 2012 - 03:30 AM, said:

I just watched a H2 channel show about the possibility of Nimisiss or what ever our Dark Sister Sun out there in Deep Space  would do to the Earth in 10 million years when Its supposed to return? WHere do these guys get this stuff ?
Anywho ! It would just about vaporize our world. Did I miss the part where we were supposed to be around in 10 million years?
WEll I know that astro-psisyicist have a way with there math and such. Good thing Im more Into Rolls Royce, Food and Sex ! What elese is there ?
Keep me Honest !
ANd for sure Keep looking Up you never know when sumptin will fall on you !

We do not have H2, heck, my wife has a real aversion to pay TV at all. She just wont have it so I visit the DVD shop a lot. It seems I am missing out!
That photo is awesome! What the heck is going on there?

[karmakazi]

DONTEATUS, on 27 April 2012 - 03:30 AM, said:

I just watched a H2 channel show about the possibility of Nimisiss or what ever our Dark Sister Sun out there in Deep Space  would do to the Earth in 10 million years when Its supposed to return? WHere do these guys get this stuff ?
Anywho ! It would just about vaporize our world. Did I miss the part where we were supposed to be around in 10 million years?
WEll I know that astro-psisyicist have a way with there math and such. Good thing Im more Into Rolls Royce, Food and Sex ! What elese is there ?
Keep me Honest !
ANd for sure Keep looking Up you never know when sumptin will fall on you !

OMG even though they're catching the bear as it falls, it so looks like the bear is jumping on a trampoline... which is AWESOME>

[DONTEATUS]

They had to Tranq the Bera it was up in Penn,State university campus ! THey got him down without injury ~ re-released in to the wild !

[Gaden]

ShadowSot, on 26 April 2012 - 05:26 AM, said:

Man,that's funny. And quite sad, considering how appropriate it is.

[Jaguiar]

Have you ever heard of the theory that man did not evolve from apes but was put here by aliens? Have you ever seen this show? Some makes sense as to how men were monkeys and how all of the sudden were they able to be intelligent? Why did humans lose their hair only to kill animals and use their hair to keep warm?

Edited by Jaguiar, 28 April 2012 - 06:17 PM.

[Gaden]

Jaguiar, on 28 April 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:

Have you ever heard of the theory that man did not evolve from apes but was put here by aliens? Have you ever seen this show? Some makes sense as to how men were monkeys and how all of the sudden were they able to be intelligent? Why did humans lose their hair only to kill animals and use their hair to keep warm?

Have you ever heard of my old friend Mr. Culous? We all called him Red... Red E.

[ShadowSot]

Jaguiar, on 28 April 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:

Have you ever heard of the theory that man did not evolve from apes but was put here by aliens? Have you ever seen this show? Some makes sense as to how men were monkeys and how all of the sudden were they able to be intelligent? Why did humans lose their hair only to kill animals and use their hair to keep warm?

No, despite what this and several other threads concerning similar topics on this forum we have never actually heard of the "ancient alien theory speculation"

To start with, how familiar are you with the currently understood evolutionary history of hominids?
I'm asking this to understand just how much understanding you already have, though if you think humans came from monkies, I'm guessing (and I don't mean this offensively) you are severely lacking in your understanding of evolution.

[nopeda]

Myles, on 24 April 2012 - 10:38 PM, said:

Quote

nopeda, on 24 April 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:
I will say I expected some people in a group called: Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon to disbelieve the possibility that xts have been here, but I'm surprised to find that it's such a huge majority who put their faith in that possibility being the correct one. Maybe it's because they end up running off most of the people who do consider the possibility of xt visits and influence.

Or maybe they are afraid of being grouped into a group that includes someone like you.

Here's a clue for you : People who consider the possibility that xts have had influence on Earth have no reason to fear being "grouped into a group" that includes people who consider the possibility that xts have had influence on Earth. It's far more likely that the rudeness of those who can't handle the possibility ran them off, even if you can't handle that possibility either.

Sensible Logic, on 24 April 2012 - 10:42 PM, said:

Quote

nopeda, on 24 April 2012 - 05:02 PM, said:
I would guess 186K miles per second if I'm at rest relative to the point of emission, though probably not if I'm moving away at 93K miles per second relative to it.

Regardless of your movement the speed of the light beam remains the same.  You are attempting to indicate that the speed of the light beam is relative to your motion and that is incorrect.
As an example.  You are driving down a long highway at a constant 60 mph, eventually you pass several cars.  One is stopped by the side of the road, one is doing 30 mph and one is doing 45 mph.  As you pass each car you look at your speedometer and you are continuing to move at a constant 60 mph.  Your speed has not changed and is not relative to the speed or lack of speed of the other vehicles.

Yes it IS relative to them. All speeds you referred to in your nonexample are relative to the surface of the Earth ONLY and not to each other. Unless you can tell us where the surface of the universe is by which we can compare all other velocities--which you can NOT--we are left to consider all velocities to be relative to something else in particular. And even if you could--which you can't--their velocities would STILL be different relative to each other than they are to the surface of the universe if such a thing did exist and we could reference it. You not only have made a huge error in this particular example, but you've shown that you don't appreciate the fact that there is no surface of the universe and the significance of that fact in regards to velocity.

[nopeda]

Myles, on 24 April 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:

Quote

nopeda, on 24 April 2012 - 05:23 PM, said:
Those things clearly appear to depict air vehicles and so far no one has suggested what else they might realistically be depicting if not air vehicles. If you want people to consider that they might be depicting something else, then let us know what things you want us to think they really are depicting.

What?   Please read the thread before you post again.  The more obvious choices have been mentioned

NO obvious choices have been mentioned. The idea of them looking like sprites does not apply. The idea of them being replaced does not appear to apply, and even if they were the idea that it's more likely for people of 1200 BC to have carved depictions of air vehicles than people from earlier times is absurd. The carvings themselves to NOT look like the have deteriorated, so that idea doesn't apply. And your absurd suggestion was the most of them all so far. I encourage you to try again this time with something that seems realistic instead of absurd.