27 replies to this topic

[Still Waters]

mysteriousuniverse.org said:

For years, sensational and sinister stories have surfaced from the forests and lowlands of Puerto Rico that tell of a strange and lethal creature roaming the landscape by night and day, while striking overwhelming terror into the hearts of the populace – which is not at all surprising since the animal has been described as having a pair of glowing red eyes, powerful, claw style hands, razor sharp teeth, a body not unlike that a monkey, a row of vicious spikes running down the length of its back, and occasionally large and leathery bat like wings.

Read more...

[xCrimsonx]

Sounds like a bitza, a little bit of a few different creatures! They ugly!

[Tiger In A Tie]

The face looks like a demonic version of Spyro the Dragon.  

[DieChecker]

This is the original reptilian chupacabras.

Before it was tagged onto hairless coyotes.

[Its Mii]

It sounds like the chupacabra is back!!

[Its Mii]

DieChecker, on 12 March 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:

This is the original reptilian chupacabras.

Before it was tagged onto hairless coyotes.

Yes!! This is the original description of the chupacabra also same place... Puerto Rico!! Interesting! Haven't even read the story yet, but just the description sent a flag up in my head. lol

Edited by Dharma D, 12 March 2012 - 10:02 PM.

[Kryso]

Maybe this is where the chupacabra takes its vacation

[Rafterman]

Wait, I thought old Chup was just hairless dog?

This is a bit of step back though because at least hairless dogs are real.  Chup the Lizard King is not.

[xCrimsonx]

Might they be evolving?

Edited by xCrimsonx, 13 March 2012 - 01:28 AM.

[Eldorado]

xCrimsonx, on 13 March 2012 - 01:27 AM, said:

Might they be evolving?

They're evolving into the next generation of good-looking but otherwise crap Twilight actors.

[xCrimsonx]

Eldorado said:

1331603000[/url]' post='4230404']
They're evolving into the next generation of good-looking but otherwise crap Twilight actors.

  Bless their toothy little soul less hearts,. That don't sparkle!

[highdesert50]

Separate incidents? Most of the photos appear to be hairless coyotes or dogs perhaps infected with skin mites ie mange. But, the human and cow relationship, if there is indeed one, perhaps might be explained as extreme cults of the type that promote pain and domination over others in order to gain a sense of power and entitlement.

[TheSpoonyOne]

I thought it was more or less accepted by most people about two years ago that the Chupacabra sightings are merely dogs/coyotes with mange?

[Junior Chubb]

DieChecker, on 12 March 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:

This is the original reptilian chupacabras.

Before it was tagged onto hairless coyotes.

Rafterman, on 12 March 2012 - 11:14 PM, said:

Wait, I thought old Chup was just hairless dog?

This is a bit of step back though because at least hairless dogs are real.  Chup the Lizard King is not.

highdesert50, on 13 March 2012 - 01:38 PM, said:

Separate incidents? Most of the photos appear to be hairless coyotes or dogs perhaps infected with skin mites ie mange. But, the human and cow relationship, if there is indeed one, perhaps might be explained as extreme cults of the type that promote pain and domination over others in order to gain a sense of power and entitlement.

TheSpoonyOne, on 13 March 2012 - 09:50 PM, said:

I thought it was more or less accepted by most people about two years ago that the Chupacabra sightings are merely dogs/coyotes with mange?

I have been in agreement with the mangey dog/coyotes idea for a while now but the dogs with mange that show up are all a bit of a let down. Not only do they water down the original description but a lot of them aren't even in Puerto Rico. I have seen these reported as dogs with mange, coyotes with mange and even coyote dog hybrids (with or without mange).

I also remember reading the original (1990's) sightings in Puerto Rico are down to hype surrounding a film released at the time. All the sightings could be traced back to one initial encounter and an over-active imagination.

Its a bit if a comedown for poor Chup's. Going from a reptilian bloodsucking monster to mange ridden small canine. This is a great example of the effects of eyewitness testimony and hearsay on a cryptids identity.

[orangepeaceful79]

Junior Chubb, on 15 March 2012 - 12:38 AM, said:

I have been in agreement with the mangey dog/coyotes idea for a while now but the dogs with mange that show up are all a bit of a let down. Not only do they water down the original description but a lot of them aren't even in Puerto Rico. I have seen these reported as dogs with mange, coyotes with mange and even coyote dog hybrids (with or without mange).

I also remember reading the original (1990's) sightings in Puerto Rico are down to hype surrounding a film released at the time. All the sightings could be traced back to one initial encounter and an over-active imagination.

Its a bit if a comedown for poor Chup's. Going from a reptilian bloodsucking monster to mange ridden small canine. This is a great example of the effects of eyewitness testimony and hearsay on a cryptids identity.

Yeah but have you ever seen a flying-glowbird- two- legged-dogman-pretending to be a werewolf-with mange riding a hyrax?  Then and only then my friend will you ever be able to say that you have truly lived. Stay thirsty my friend, stay thirsty.