18 replies to this topic

[RingFenceTheCity]

She sounds very believable to me. The extra video footage isn't much good btw.

[Rafterman]

If I recall, our friends at the BFRO looked at this and didn't find it credible.  Didn't their analysis indicate that it was most probably someone with a backpack?

[RingFenceTheCity]

Rafterman, on 25 March 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:

If I recall, our friends at the BFRO looked at this and didn't find it credible.  Didn't their analysis indicate that it was most probably someone with a backpack?

Sounds very possible. Personally, I think it was a mistake to include that film footage. It's her story of the smell and close sighting which is of interest.

[Rafterman]

tailormaneinafog, on 25 March 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:

Sounds very possible. Personally, I think it was a mistake to include that film footage. It's her story of the smell and close sighting which is of interest.

It raises a red flag with me when it's always the same person that has the encounters and the comments about "man moving into the wilderness" is hogwash.  Here in the Northeast, that was done 150 years ago.

[QuiteContrary]

Again, the blurry footage.

Is there some sort of bigfoot lense cover they all use? Is Patterson Gimlin the only nonblob image?

It is just so hard to believe no one can take a clear photo. What do footers think of the lack of unambiguous images? It isn't one or two it is just about all images, at least it seems to be. Yet, I can take decent photos with my cell.

How do they explain this? How can they defend it? And "every witness was scared (shaking) or moving in a vehicle or BF has some sort of powers that prevent clear images" doesn't fly either.  
Why wouldn't those who claim these images taken by others are  evidence,  be the least bit suspicious after all this time of ambiguous offerings.

Edited by QuiteContrary, 25 March 2012 - 05:49 PM.

[vitruvian12]

tailormaneinafog, on 25 March 2012 - 02:34 PM, said:

She sounds very believable to me. The extra video footage isn't much good btw.

Four teenagers in the woods sounds like at least alcohol could have been involved.  That plus the time between the experience and now would add to the possible inaccuracies of her telling. As far as the video goes she said they backed up. Where is the additional video of that? Why were they just driving along filming the roadside anyways?  Just hoping to find what they were looking for?

[keninsc]

Rafterman, on 25 March 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:

If I recall, our friends at the BFRO looked at this and didn't find it credible.  Didn't their analysis indicate that it was most probably someone with a backpack?

Are you kidding? They were all excited to have had a real encounter there. They've never been to a place that they didn't find Squatches.

[Rafterman]

keninsc, on 25 March 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:

Are you kidding? They were all excited to have had a real encounter there. They've never been to a place that they didn't find Squatches.

They actually said the video wasn't credible, but still felt they needed to do a night investigation just in case.

[RingFenceTheCity]

tailormaneinafog, on 25 March 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:

Sounds very possible. Personally, I think it was a mistake to include that film footage. It's her story of the smell and close sighting which is of interest.

The smell also fits with the recent Navajo cops pursuit of the yellow eyed Howler.

[Rafterman]

tailormaneinafog, on 26 March 2012 - 08:27 AM, said:

The smell also fits with the recent Navajo cops pursuit of the yellow eyed Howler.

Given the description of the location, I would argue that a rotting deer carcass or similar type of roadkill is what they smelled.  Much more likely scenario compared to a bigfoot.

[RingFenceTheCity]

Rafterman, on 26 March 2012 - 01:20 PM, said:

Given the description of the location, I would argue that a rotting deer carcass or similar type of roadkill is what they smelled.  Much more likely scenario compared to a bigfoot.

Hahahahahahah! So now Navajo cops are stupid too, huh? You know better, even though you've got no training, experience, oh, and you weren't even there!

[Rafterman]

tailormaneinafog, on 26 March 2012 - 02:48 PM, said:

Hahahahahahah! So now Navajo cops are stupid too, huh? You know better, even though you've got no training, experience, oh, and you weren't even there!

I was referring to your original post - Rhode Island - and living in the general area, I do have some expertise in what stinks on the side of the road in the summertime around here.

But since you brought it up, could you share with us your experiences with the Northeastern United States or the Navajo Nation?

[RingFenceTheCity]

Rafterman, on 26 March 2012 - 03:29 PM, said:

I was referring to your original post - Rhode Island - and living in the general area, I do have some expertise in what stinks on the side of the road in the summertime around here.

But since you brought it up, could you share with us your experiences with the Northeastern United States or the Navajo Nation?

I trust qualified experts much more than you..

[The New Richard Nixon]

tailormaneinafog, on 26 March 2012 - 04:46 PM, said:

I trust qualified experts much more than you..

Are you going to reply or not? frankly iv'e had enough with your poor stories and poor quality links and videos you post. I bet many of us agree that you only believe people in video's? get real and post something credible or don't waste our time.

[keninsc]

tailormaneinafog, on 26 March 2012 - 04:46 PM, said:

I trust qualified experts much more than you..

Enlighten us, where can we find a "qualified expert" for a creature that is yet unknown? Just curious.