41 replies to this topic

[regi]

Re: Simpson's attempt to disappear, there's not a more obvious display of guilt.
It was entirely self-serving, the same as the "farewell letter".
No one but Simpson could have possibly benefited from either.

[regi]

violetlight, on 25 June 2012 - 05:04 PM, said:

Yep ,Ronald Goldman was totally just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Poor guy.

I have read Outrage, and I agree with you - great book!!

If you haven't read And The Sea Will Tell, also by Bugliosi, I highly recommend it, too.  (As awful as that crime is, I found the story mesmerizing.)
Bugliosi was the defender in that case, and in the trial and book he spoke of a "consciousness of innocence" shown by his client.
Whereas Simpson's behavior demonstrated a consciousness of guilt, the defendant in this other case demonstrated innocence by her actions and statements before the trial and (I think) more importantly, before the crime was discovered; that her actions and  statements simply didn't make sense if she'd have actually been of a certain knowledge.
It's fascinating.

[Antilles]

violetlight, on 25 June 2012 - 05:04 PM, said:

Yep ,Ronald Goldman was totally just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Poor guy.

I have read Outrage, and I agree with you - great book!!

I feel very sorry for both victims but probably more for Ron Goldman. As you say, poor bas**** was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Unless Simpson was tipped off that there was a man at Nicole's or a man was going to be there.

That's one point about this case I've always wondered about. Goldman and Simpson both there at the same time - some deadly karma or a setup?

[regi]

Antilles, on 01 July 2012 - 06:42 AM, said:

That's one point about this case I've always wondered about. Goldman and Simpson both there at the same time - some deadly karma or a setup?

Antilles, I'm curious to know how you think a set-up was possible, and why that would make sense.

[Antilles]

regi, on 03 July 2012 - 02:14 PM, said:

Antilles, I'm curious to know how you think a set-up was possible, and why that would make sense.

Let's just say that I rarely believe things at face value. Simpson had been there before and seen Nicole with other men.
But why that night did he decide to kill her? That night when Goldman goes there to return sunglasses she had left at Mezzaluna?
It could just have been really bad cosmic karma on Goldman's part...coincidences do happen and the police never raised the issue. But I do still wonder.

[regi]

Antilles, on 04 July 2012 - 05:59 AM, said:

Let's just say that I rarely believe things at face value. Simpson had been there before and seen Nicole with other men.
But why that night did he decide to kill her? That night when Goldman goes there to return sunglasses she had left at Mezzaluna?
It could just have been really bad cosmic karma on Goldman's part...coincidences do happen and the police never raised the issue. But I do still wonder.

Well, some things only the killer will ever know.
Re: the police, I think their only concern was with the who, not the why.

[regi]

Antilles, on 04 July 2012 - 05:59 AM, said:

That night when Goldman goes there to return sunglasses she had left at Mezzaluna?

It was Nicole's mother's glasses that Goldman had agreed to deliver to Nicole. Nicole's mother had spoken to Nicole about having left them at the restaurant, and Nicole called the restaurant, and they located them outside in the gutter.

Goldman was said to have had other plans that night. A friend (I believe he was also a co-worker) said that as the two of them were left the restaurant, among the last words between he and Goldman were about them meeting up later at a specific place. I don't remember if the friend said whether there was talk of Goldman also returning the glasses before they were to meet back up, but I don't think it matters. The point is that it appears that Goldman was at Nicole's only to return the glasses, which surely wasn't a planned event.

[Sweetpumper]

Have you ever heard of Glen Rogers?
Probably not because Glen Rogers is one of America’s least-known serial killers (70, possibly 80 people). But wait. He is also most likely the real murderer of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

http://www.nypost.co...6gjHP9SbvpFRXQO

[Simbi Laveau]

I think it was the son .It's why OJ endured the trial the way he did .

[Simbi Laveau]

Sweetpumper, on 19 November 2012 - 05:00 PM, said:

Have you ever heard of Glen Rogers?
Probably not because Glen Rogers is one of America’s least-known serial killers (70, possibly 80 people). But wait. He is also most likely the real murderer of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

http://www.nypost.co...6gjHP9SbvpFRXQO

Hmmm,that is quite interesting ,and makes sense...

[supervike]

Wow, 7 minutes to change your mind completely.

[Antilles]

Sweetpumper, on 19 November 2012 - 05:00 PM, said:

Have you ever heard of Glen Rogers?
Probably not because Glen Rogers is one of America’s least-known serial killers (70, possibly 80 people). But wait. He is also most likely the real murderer of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

http://www.nypost.co...6gjHP9SbvpFRXQO

Next they'll be pushing this thug as the assassin who killed JFK.