Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 1 votes

Earliest evidence of man-made fire


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 37,055 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Que Sera, Sera - Whatever will be, will be..

Posted 03 April 2012 - 11:54 AM

www.livescience.com said:

Ash and charred bone, the earliest known evidence of controlled use of fire, reveal that human ancestors may have used fire a million years ago, a discovery that researchers say will shed light on this major turning point in human evolution.

Posted Image Read more...


Posted Image

#2    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 34,344 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 03 April 2012 - 08:05 PM

www.newscientist.com said:

You could call it the original baptism of fire: the moment hominins first began controlling flames. There is now evidence that moment came at least 1 million years ago, a finding that will reignite the debate over whether human anatomy was changed forever by cooking.

Fire is a tricky thing to pin down in the archaeological record.According to Michael Chazan at the University of Toronto, Canada, the oldest obvious hearths are just 400,000 years old though the remains of burned wood, stones and food at an Israeli site suggests that hominins were using fire 790,000 years ago.

Posted Image Read more...


A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#3    Paracelse

Paracelse

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,074 posts
  • Joined:02 Mar 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

Posted 04 April 2012 - 10:41 AM

Did they find marshmallows, hershey bars and graham crackers?

Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither Benjamin Franklin
République No.6
It's time for a sixth republic.

#4    GirlfromOz

GirlfromOz

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2011

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:23 PM

It really peaves me off that mankind is looked at as intellectually inferior etc in what is perceived of as 'cave man' era from what is called,by science,'pre history'. Doesn't anyone realise that we are all descendants of the early humans & that early humans were intellectually & physically superior,&,speaking simplistically,when you make a copy of a copy in the gene pool etc,like in human history,doh,the quality degenerates.We have all been lead down the garden path.We are mere shadows of what our ancestors were.Man knew fire,chemicals,astronomy,agronomy,science,music etc etc This story is utter rubbish.Even Darwin has been disproved with his theories of evolution.Apes are apes & humans are humans as dogs are dogs & birds have many varieties,but they are still bloody birds.We are not linked to apes!!!Why do we follow all the fairy stories of what these idiots dictate to us???Well.doh!! LOL He knew bloody well how to make fire!!


#5    GirlfromOz

GirlfromOz

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2011

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:24 PM

It really peaves me off that mankind is looked at as intellectually inferior etc in what is perceived of as 'cave man' era from what is called,by science,'pre history'. Doesn't anyone realise that we are all descendants of the early humans & that early humans were intellectually & physically superior,&,speaking simplistically,when you make a copy of a copy in the gene pool etc,like in human history,doh,the quality degenerates.We have all been lead down the garden path.We are mere shadows of what our ancestors were.Man knew fire,chemicals,astronomy,agronomy,science,music etc etc This story is utter rubbish.Even Darwin has been disproved with his theories of evolution.Apes are apes & humans are humans as dogs are dogs & birds have many varieties,but they are still bloody birds.We are not linked to apes!!!Why do we follow all the fairy stories of what these idiots dictate to us???Well.doh!! LOL He knew bloody well how to make fire!!


#6    GirlfromOz

GirlfromOz

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2011

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:26 PM

PS Sorry about the double-up.I pressed enter twice.Oh,& I am not an ape LOL


#7    seller2006

seller2006

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 458 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

  • Student of the Quran

Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:23 PM

View PostGirlfromOz, on 04 April 2012 - 12:24 PM, said:

It really peaves me off that mankind is looked at as intellectually inferior etc in what is perceived of as 'cave man' era from what is called,by science,'pre history'. Doesn't anyone realise that we are all descendants of the early humans & that early humans were intellectually & physically superior,&,speaking simplistically,when you make a copy of a copy in the gene pool etc,like in human history,doh,the quality degenerates.We have all been lead down the garden path.We are mere shadows of what our ancestors were.Man knew fire,chemicals,astronomy,agronomy,science,music etc etc This story is utter rubbish.Even Darwin has been disproved with his theories of evolution.Apes are apes & humans are humans as dogs are dogs & birds have many varieties,but they are still bloody birds.We are not linked to apes!!!Why do we follow all the fairy stories of what these idiots dictate to us???Well.doh!! LOL He knew bloody well how to make fire!!
convetional history states we were making cave paintings as cave men 10 thousands yrs ago, when they are found structures up to 32 thousand bc -.-, it makes no sense, if they push back the times, many things will change in our understanding of our selves, and identity and i think that is wthey refrain from speaking the truth about us.

Posted Image

Check out some of my raps.. http://www.unexplain...log&blogid=3016

Check out my Concious Hip Hop, http://www.youtube.c...Adealist/videos

#8    BrandOfAmber

BrandOfAmber

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 104 posts
  • Joined:14 Dec 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

  • Life is the lust of the lamp for the light that is dark till the dawn of the day that we die...

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:25 PM

@GirlFromOz, according to your genetic code, you are indeed an ape.  A great ape to be precise, and that is nothing to be ashamed of.

Seriously, I know some silverbacked gorillas I'd rather hang with than humans who would deny their own genetic heritage...

Be proud of what you are.

- Brand


#9    RightInTheStatisticals

RightInTheStatisticals

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 96 posts
  • Joined:29 Mar 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fresno, CA

  • Do, or do not, there is no try. ~ A little green alien

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:51 PM

View Postseller2006, on 04 April 2012 - 02:23 PM, said:

convetional history states we were making cave paintings as cave men 10 thousands yrs ago, when they are found structures up to 32 thousand bc -.-, it makes no sense, if they push back the times, many things will change in our understanding of our selves, and identity and i think that is wthey refrain from speaking the truth about us.
Did you mean 23K years ago (link)? That is some wall in a cave humans built to keep out the cold. I can't find anything ealier than that that has been confirmed.

View PostGirlfromOz, on 04 April 2012 - 12:23 PM, said:

It really peaves me off that mankind is looked at as intellectually inferior etc in what is perceived of as 'cave man' era from what is called,by science,'pre history'.
Who has ever claimed mankind is inferior, even back then? Our brains have may have developed a a tiny bit since then, but the general package was there around the 'cave man' era.

View PostGirlfromOz, on 04 April 2012 - 12:23 PM, said:

Even Darwin has been disproved with his theories of evolution.
The theory of evolution has been disproven? Really .. when did this happen?


#10    pallidin

pallidin

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,155 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 04 April 2012 - 07:47 PM

It didn't happen. Sounds more like an opinion than fact.


#11    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 16,287 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:11 AM

Very cool. It is easy to hypothisize then that Modern Humans, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, evolved from earlier forms and that fire was always present during that time 200,000 years ago.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#12    GirlfromOz

GirlfromOz

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2011

Posted 05 April 2012 - 08:47 AM

Dear BrandofAmber.Wouldn't you think that instead of saying that humans were an offshoot of apes,that it was the other way around??!The theory is that apes were an offshoot of humans!!Maybe close but not the full deal.Let's all get the story right! OK?!


#13    RightInTheStatisticals

RightInTheStatisticals

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 96 posts
  • Joined:29 Mar 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fresno, CA

  • Do, or do not, there is no try. ~ A little green alien

Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:16 PM

View PostGirlfromOz, on 05 April 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

Dear BrandofAmber.Wouldn't you think that instead of saying that humans were an offshoot of apes,that it was the other way around??!The theory is that apes were an offshoot of humans!!Maybe close but not the full deal.Let's all get the story right! OK?!

Well, technically Humans and apes are both offshoots of another common ancestor species. To say one is an offshoot of the other is incorrect.


#14    daavin

daavin

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined:25 May 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lloydminster, Alberta

  • nothing witty, nothing profound... just me.

Posted 07 April 2012 - 05:23 PM

View PostRightInTheStatisticals, on 05 April 2012 - 07:16 PM, said:

Well, technically Humans and apes are both offshoots of another common ancestor species. To say one is an offshoot of the other is incorrect.
Yup it's like saying a turkey came from a chicken they share a common ancestor one off chute becoming a chicken and one becoming a turkey, same for humans and apes.

I spy with my little eye something that starts with come here and ends with OUCH
                                                   Black Adder

#15    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,463 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 08 April 2012 - 06:29 PM

It's comforting to hear that we've  always had fire..  some ideas are persistent!    Home is where the Hearth is.

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users