No, the whole Law is a pattern for the Christ. Man gives his most perfect beast for atonement. God gives his perfect Son for the salvation of all. Afterall, Christ had to fulfill the whole Law? Right?
Well, what sacrifice would the Son of God give for atonement? With a filthy beast? How does the Christ fulfill the atonement DEMANDED by the Law? Hmmm... sure beats me (sarcasm).
Well, if He lives without sin, then there is no requirement of a blood atonement YET to fulfill the WHOLE LAW... there is no forgiveness of sins without a propitiary offering... AND yet also the whole Law NEEDS to be fulfilled including the blood atonement. Blood atonement is an absolutely necessary component of the Law, otherwise the WHOLE Law remains unfulfilled.
Now, this Israel/Scapegoat nonsense you keep dribbling has absolutely no scriptural grounds whatsoever.