Honestly Q24, have you just skipped over my posts here in the last couple of days? This is all repeat information. Are you going to make me repeat the information from USAir Flight 427 too?
And do you know, I’m not convinced which way that plane came from in any case.
The official flight paths/identity of any given aircraft at any time can be deceptive.
You aren't convinced of the flight path? Oh let me guess... the RADAR data was faked too?
Honestly, this is getting ridiculous Q24.
There is nothing to back-up that the passenger revolt was actually a success. I’m trying to think what confirms it… all I can come up with is that if the flight wasn’t shot down then it must have been due to the passengers. So there is no direct evidence the passenger revolt was a success, at best just a type of deduction that it must have been… and only because you don’t want to accept the shootdown (which has more direct evidence in the first place).
You are the one avoiding things. Answer the damn question I posed about why there is no debris north of the debris field. If the plane had been shot minutes before there should be debris north of the debris field. There wasn't. Why? Because Flight 93 wasn't shot down.
Come on Q24. You are an extremely intelligent guy. Why are you arguing against the facts?