Jump to content

Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.

- - - - -

Is the world sitting on a tinderbox?

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 43,364 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Sometimes it's better to keep the mystery unexplained.

Posted 15 April 2012 - 03:25 PM

www.telegraph.co.uk said:

With Iran forced into nuclear talks, Syria’s ceasefire barely holding and North Korea snubbing the West, could these rogue states threaten global stability?

The conference centre was cleared of alcohol, a prayer room prepared and female officials advised to dress with a special touch of modesty.When Iran’s negotiators are in town, the challenge of hosting them without offending their fragile sensibilities follows in their wake.

These black-clad, silver-haired men came to Istanbul yesterday to do verbal battle with the world’s leading powers. With hardened realism, a diplomat warned beforehand that a wise observer would set his sights low.

Nonetheless, Iran is back at the negotiating table, formally meeting its adversaries for the first time in more than a year. Not only is the Islamic Republic talking again, but its leaders have quietly dropped a raft of preconditions and begun discussing their nuclear ambitions.

Posted Image

Posted Image

#2    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 17,766 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies for the hardest victory is over SELF.

Posted 15 April 2012 - 05:56 PM

For me, Syria is the most troubling.  If Assad cannot maintain a ceasefire because the rebels won't give in, then the world is faced with no choice except to attack him or leave his people to be slaughtered.  I think that eventually the world outcry will be so great against this monstrosity that Turkey, as  part of a NATO mission, will impose a no fly zone and attempt to set up sanctuaries for the civilians (and rebels) within Syria.  Assad cannot survive under those conditions and I think he could attack Israel as a diversion.

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...
“This is like playing poker with a guy who cheated you twice before. You know who does that, a moron.

#3    SolarPlexus


    Warrior of Light

  • Banned
  • 4,200 posts
  • Joined:28 Sep 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Serbia

  • .....This moment contains all moments.....

    ...You dont have a Soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.....

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:20 AM

Iran - Nothing new there i.e. perpetual 'nuclear talks' whereas no side will give in. A few months back I thought it could have gotten ugly over the strait of Hormuz, and it could have, but now the attention is shifted to Syria.

NK - Nothing new there either. Supposed NK's 'nuclear capability' is far overblown by the western media. This is one sad communist nation, shut-in and not a threat to anyone (except maybe their own people). There is always tension on the NK/SK border however, but I think the chances now are minor.

Syria - I think this one is the most troubling as well. It's tricky because Syria and Iran have signed a defensive pact some years back. Turkey, as the closest NATO member, is engaged heavily in arming Syrian rebels, undermining the peace plan. Qatar and Saudi Arabia also lobbying heavily for an intervention. And don't forget the Russian-built port from the times of the Cold War. As I understand the base is still staffed by Russian naval personnel. Last i heard, aircraft carrier Kuznetsov was on its way there.

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual."
Galileo Galilei
Posted Image
"Who never walks save where he sees men's tracks makes no discoveries."J.G. Holland

#4    Corp



  • Member
  • 6,961 posts
  • Joined:19 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 16 April 2012 - 04:44 PM

In a word, no

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse...A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

#5    Knight Of Shadows

Knight Of Shadows

    Shadow Dancer

  • Member
  • 5,552 posts
  • Joined:17 Mar 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free Syria

  • Rest In Peace A.B

Posted 16 April 2012 - 07:50 PM

it may come to that i honestly think so
the problem is each one of those are linked to each other
and the recent actions here are unbelieveable and i think it'll only get worse

"why should we not rely on Allah when he guided us our path . we shall certainly bear with patience all the hurt you may cause us. for those who want to put their trust in someone should put their trust in Allah.

#6    Black Red Devil

Black Red Devil

    Mean as Hell

  • Member
  • 3,002 posts
  • Joined:04 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:52 AM

All three are in-influential on the political world scale, so the answer is no, although Iran, because of their oil and natural gas deposits could cause global shock waves in the financial markets around the world.

We are each our own devil, and we make this world our hell

- Oscar Wilde

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users