Jump to content


- - - - -

The Lambton Worm


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#46    ThePhantomFlanFlinger

ThePhantomFlanFlinger

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,313 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:37 PM

View Postspud the mackem, on 27 April 2012 - 04:33 PM, said:

I stand corrected,but my question is ,why did they pick a foreigner to be the Patron Saint of England ? we must not have had anyone capable in the eyes of the Church which was all powerfull them days,maybe I would have chosen St.Bede or St.Cuthbert too late now tho'.

We should have King Arthur...but thats a whole different kettle of worms...so to speak...:wacko:

#47    Flibbertigibbet

Flibbertigibbet

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 503 posts
  • Joined:24 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

  • “I don't care what you say about me, just spell my name right.”
    ― P.T. Barnam

Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:38 PM

View PostBrianPotter, on 27 April 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:

We should have King Arthur...but thats a whole different kettle of worms...so to speak...:wacko:

He's not a saint, either.

#48    spud the mackem

spud the mackem

    Spud the Mackem

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,973 posts
  • Joined:28 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yeo Valley,Darkest Somerset.

  • man who ask for nothing shall never be disappointed

Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:54 PM

View PostFlibbertigibbet, on 27 April 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:

St Edmund, the king of East Anglia who was slain by the Danes, was generally regarded as England's patron saint until quite late in the middle ages. St George was adopted during the Crusades because the English wanted to trade with Genoa, which also had him as its patron.
  Well you certainly know your history Young Lady,that was one of my "Hate" subjects at school because I could never remember dates/times etc,and still cannot ,so I'm off to sulk ha ha, but I shall remain friendly..
(1) try your best, ............if that dont work.
(2) try your second best, ........if that dont work
(3) give up you aint gonna win

#49    ThePhantomFlanFlinger

ThePhantomFlanFlinger

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,313 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:02 PM

View PostFlibbertigibbet, on 27 April 2012 - 04:38 PM, said:

He's not a saint, either.


Kettle and Worms mean anything to you..?

Edited by BrianPotter, 27 April 2012 - 05:02 PM.


#50    Flibbertigibbet

Flibbertigibbet

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 503 posts
  • Joined:24 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

  • “I don't care what you say about me, just spell my name right.”
    ― P.T. Barnam

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:09 PM

View PostBrianPotter, on 27 April 2012 - 05:02 PM, said:

Kettle and Worms mean anything to you..?

Something like kettle of fish?

#51    Macroramphosis

Macroramphosis

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 241 posts
  • Joined:02 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deep in the bosom of suburbia, Stuart, FL

  • "The clever men at Oxford
    Know all that there is to be knowed.
    But they none of them know one half as much
    As intelligent Mr. Toad!"

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:14 PM

View Postspud the mackem, on 27 April 2012 - 04:08 PM, said:

The river is tidal.

I am sure it is, especially in the estuary.  Indeed, most rivers are tidal. Unfortunately, conger eels, especially ones big enough to eat cattle wouldn't be caught dead nearly nine miles from the sea, in water shallow enough that the first frost will kill them off. Big eels like deep water, specifically water over 60' deep, and a 100lb conger is a rarity in water that shallow. Something big enough to eat cattle would have to be at least 300 to 400lbs in weight, and for that we have to enter the realm of speculation and fantasy, which is where we will end up anyway if we are to believe a conger, according to the tale, would happily sun itself on the hill and wrap its tail around the base of it.

I have far less problem believing it was a dragon.

note: yes, I know that there has supposed to have been a 362lb conger caught once south of Iceland, but no one has ever managed to find definitive proof of it, and it was caught at a depth of 150 plus metres.

Edited by Macroramphosis, 27 April 2012 - 05:15 PM.

“You can't stay in your corner of the Forest waiting for others to come to you. You have to go to them sometimes.”

#52    ThePhantomFlanFlinger

ThePhantomFlanFlinger

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,313 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:15 PM

View PostFlibbertigibbet, on 27 April 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:

Something like kettle of fish?

Similar my young dear...its nice to see our future upon these boards.Make our great country proud.:tu:


not a joke btw....it is nice to see...:)

#53    ealdwita

ealdwita

    Hwít éoredmæcg

  • Member
  • 3,853 posts
  • Joined:08 Jun 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Éastcentingas , England

  • Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað.

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:22 PM

View PostBrianPotter, on 27 April 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:

We should have King Arthur...but thats a whole different kettle of worms...so to speak...:wacko:

I can hardly think of anyone less qualified to become England's patron saint! The Welsh cleric Nennius first mentions him in his 9th.Century Historia Britonum and portrays him as a Romano-British chieftain fighting against The Anglo-Saxons (who incidentally, laid the foundations of England) and most sources that mention Arthur are of Welsh or Breton origin. His name is thought to be derived from the Romano-Etruscan Artorius. Almost everything else that is generally 'known' about him today comes from the romantic and often febrile imagination of Geoffrey of Monmouth in the 1130's who places Arthur in Cornwall. (Much more romantic in the 12th.Century than Wales, I'm afraid!)

I could continue, but I can see several of you dozing off at the back!

Posted Image

St.Edmund for me!
"Gæð a wyrd swa hio scel, ac gecnáwan þín gefá!": "Fate goes ever as she shall, but know thine enemy!".

"I was born with a priceless gift - the ability to laugh at other peoples' troubles" - Dame Edna Everage

#54    ealdwita

ealdwita

    Hwít éoredmæcg

  • Member
  • 3,853 posts
  • Joined:08 Jun 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Éastcentingas , England

  • Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað.

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:24 PM

(Double post. Sorry)

Edited by ealdwita, 27 April 2012 - 05:25 PM.

"Gæð a wyrd swa hio scel, ac gecnáwan þín gefá!": "Fate goes ever as she shall, but know thine enemy!".

"I was born with a priceless gift - the ability to laugh at other peoples' troubles" - Dame Edna Everage

#55    ThePhantomFlanFlinger

ThePhantomFlanFlinger

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,313 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:30 PM

View Postealdwita, on 27 April 2012 - 05:24 PM, said:

(Double post. Sorry)
LOL..my kettle is getting fuller ealdwita....i agree with you but my humour is strange...:)

#56    spud the mackem

spud the mackem

    Spud the Mackem

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,973 posts
  • Joined:28 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yeo Valley,Darkest Somerset.

  • man who ask for nothing shall never be disappointed

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:56 PM

View PostMacroramphosis, on 27 April 2012 - 05:14 PM, said:

I am sure it is, especially in the estuary.  Indeed, most rivers are tidal. Unfortunately, conger eels, especially ones big enough to eat cattle wouldn't be caught dead nearly nine miles from the sea, in water shallow enough that the first frost will kill them off. Big eels like deep water, specifically water over 60' deep, and a 100lb conger is a rarity in water that shallow. Something big enough to eat cattle would have to be at least 300 to 400lbs in weight, and for that we have to enter the realm of speculation and fantasy, which is where we will end up anyway if we are to believe a conger, according to the tale, would happily sun itself on the hill and wrap its tail around the base of it.

I have far less problem believing it was a dragon.

note: yes, I know that there has supposed to have been a 362lb conger caught once south of Iceland, but no one has ever managed to find definitive proof of it, and it was caught at a depth of 150 plus metres.
Hey man,thanks for the lesson,I was only speculating on what it might have been, I mean Congers are real ,Dragons are mythical,and although the L.W may have been some kind of "fishy like" predator,nothing is big enough to wrap itself around a hill,thats purely folklore filled with exageration like all past legends.Werewolves/vampires,figments of imagination yet people believe that there are such things..cheers
(1) try your best, ............if that dont work.
(2) try your second best, ........if that dont work
(3) give up you aint gonna win




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users