The B.C. Supreme Court is ordering a lesbian couple, now separated, to divide leftover sperm from their donor as part of the division of their assets.
The couple began a relationship in 1998 and each had one child during the marriage, using the donor sperm.
If they jointly owned them and one person decides they want to give their child a sibling, why should the other partner make the decision that they should all be destroyed? It seems a little selfish to me.