ninjadude, on 06 May 2012 - 08:24 PM, said:
No it was not. It was not a jobs bill. Had it been a jobs bill, it would have been structured differently. It was an economic stimulus. And it did.
Wikipedia and several other sites tend to disagree with that assessment.
http://en.wikipedia....ent_Act_of_2009
Quote
To respond to the late-2000s recession, the primary objective for ARRA was to save and create jobs almost immediately. Secondary objectives were to provide temporary relief programs for those most impacted by the recession and invest in infrastructure, education, health, and ‘green’ energy.
http://www.gpo.gov/f...ent-detail.html
Quote
An act making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.
If it was not a jobs bill, why put that as the first thing in the title? Most probably when the bill was in committee, that is the first thing they DID decide, that it would be a jobs bill.
Look at what the Democrats are calling Jobs Bills over the last 2 years anyway. The title of jobs bill is very malliable.
Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.
At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche
Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker