"Truth will first be ridiculed, then violently opposed, and finally accepted as self-evident" A. Schopenhauer 1788-1860
Posted 21 September 2004 - 11:34 PM
QUOTE(Michelle @ Sep 21 2004, 01:39 PM)
Hey Homer, I'm getting off topic, but did you see Kerry on Letterman last night? He disappointed me again, and I keep trying to give the guy the benefit of the doubt. Not one single question that Letterman ask him did he answer. Letterman was obviously getting irritated but managed to keep it under control.
I had my pencil poised to write down the first straight answer he gave and I got nothing... again.
homer thanks for reminding everyone about the presidential debates.
IM looking forward to this.
Wether or not your a bush supporter you have to agree that he isnt the most eloquent and well informed public speaker in politics, just think back to that press conference regarding the war he held at the Whitehouse with tony blair , if you had been an outsider youd have thought Blair was the President of the USA not bush.
I think kerry might give bush a roasting and if im not mistaken presidencies have been one and lost on that debate alone.
ALthough kerry doesnt exaclt exude charisma lol.
Stand up for the Champions
'MON the tic an tiocfaidh ar-la
"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst."
Posted 22 September 2004 - 10:13 PM
Too many people on both sides of the spectrum have fallen into this mentality that a full one half of the country are the enemy for having different beliefs...in a country based on freedom of expression. It is this infighting that allows the focus to be taken away from "we the people" being able to watch, and have control over government corruption and ineptitude that is running rampant in our leadership.
People should be working towards fixing problems, not creating them.
haha, of course it doesn't, it means the guy is just out there to get votes as opposed to having an actual position on anything:)
I'm John Kerry, and I'm not Bush. I also won 3 purple hearts..
Why would Rather need to produce fake documents to prove that Bush shirked his duty? Surely there would be actual evidence considering the amount of people who claim Bush did indeed do what people have...claimed...he uh did?