35 replies to this topic

[Kazahel]

Leonardo, on 22 May 2012 - 04:31 PM, said:

Exactly!

Well I dont understand how there can be a right or wrong.

Leonardo, on 22 May 2012 - 04:31 PM, said:

Why have 'invisible art' from "famous artists"? Princess Tumbleweed showed that one doesn't have to be "famous" (no disrespect intended, Princess) to be an artist, and the quality of Princess's 'invisible art' was equal to that of these "famous artists".

Maybe if someone is familiar with a certain artist they will imagine something along a similar style. Almost like how I imagined all the types of corny responses that would come after reading the heading of this thread after being in this forum for such a time.

Anyway and I guess it just takes a more famous artist to have an idea recognized. I think they are exploring and just experimenting which I suppose is something artists do.

[csspwns]

if its invisible how are we suppose to see it? backlight maybe? o.O

[JGirl]

this smacks of 'the emperor's new clothes'

[WoIverine]

csspwns, on 23 May 2012 - 02:32 AM, said:

if its invisible how are we suppose to see it? backlight maybe? o.O

backlight, or blacklight?

[Princess Tumbleweed]

I wonder if they added this to the exhibition?
http://www.unexplain...howtopic=206992

This is just part of the story:

Community members had accused him of talking to animals and using an invisible penis to sleep with women in the informal settlement.

They also accused his wife of turning into a snail and terrorising the community.

[Englishgent]

It would appear that if you are a known artist you can get away with anything.  Sometimes I think these artists take us 'common' folk as gullible fools.
I wont even mention what I think of those stuck up sticky beak art critics lol