Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Lunar Anomalies.


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#1    nephilim12

nephilim12

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 46 posts
  • Joined:21 May 2012

Posted 22 May 2012 - 02:19 PM

With many private lunar observers all over the world having access to powerful telescopes and filming what appear not to be natural structures, the latest pictures that flood the net were often dismissed as hoaxes until the Indian Space Research Organisation ( A fully Government agency ) released pictures of the lunar surface showing anomalies taken by their powerful imaging equipment.
This revelation is shocking for the public since agencies around the world had suppressed such information for the last 4 decades.
Any one can see these pictures in the official site of ISRO.
Most shocking are the presence of building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters, etc.
Check guys. We have a right to know what lies beyond.


#2    Timonthy

Timonthy

    Placid

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,756 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Aust.

Posted 22 May 2012 - 02:29 PM

View Postnephilim12, on 22 May 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:

With many private lunar observers all over the world having access to powerful telescopes and filming what appear not to be natural structures, the latest pictures that flood the net were often dismissed as hoaxes until the Indian Space Research Organisation ( A fully Government agency ) released pictures of the lunar surface showing anomalies taken by their powerful imaging equipment.
This revelation is shocking for the public since agencies around the world had suppressed such information for the last 4 decades.
Any one can see these pictures in the official site of ISRO.
Most shocking are the presence of building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters, etc.
Check guys. We have a right to know what lies beyond.
I'm going to be the first to throw it out there, without looking at any photos, by saying it's all natural baby!

Still interested in seeing some strange natural formations though. Any pictures in particular?

Edit: I'd be happy for you to convince me otherwise though... Can you post the images of what you've described?

(And can we make this strictly about the ISRO images, there are plenty of topics on moon anomalies already)

Edited by Timonthy, 22 May 2012 - 02:42 PM.

Posted Image


#3    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,387 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 22 May 2012 - 04:48 PM

View Postnephilim12, on 22 May 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:

With many private lunar observers all over the world having access to powerful telescopes and filming what appear not to be natural structures, the latest pictures that flood the net were often dismissed as hoaxes until the Indian Space Research Organisation ( A fully Government agency ) released pictures of the lunar surface showing anomalies taken by their powerful imaging equipment.
This revelation is shocking for the public since agencies around the world had suppressed such information for the last 4 decades.
Any one can see these pictures in the official site of ISRO.
Most shocking are the presence of building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters, etc.
Check guys. We have a right to know what lies beyond.

Please link to these photos directly and provide us your detailed analysis.

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#4    Pax Unum

Pax Unum

    < 420 Conspirator >

  • Member
  • 18,718 posts
  • Joined:06 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suburbia

  • "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:54 AM

View Postnephilim12, on 22 May 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:

With many private lunar observers all over the world having access to powerful telescopes and filming what appear not to be natural structures, the latest pictures that flood the net were often dismissed as hoaxes until the Indian Space Research Organisation ( A fully Government agency ) released pictures of the lunar surface showing anomalies taken by their powerful imaging equipment.
This revelation is shocking for the public since agencies around the world had suppressed such information for the last 4 decades.
Any one can see these pictures in the official site of ISRO.
Most shocking are the presence of building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters, etc.
Check guys. We have a right to know what lies beyond.
Replying to bolded:

Quote

Complex craters have uplifted centers, and they have typically broad flat shallow crater floors, and terraced walls.

Tycho crater is an example

Posted Image

So a pile of rubble in the center of a crater isn't a Maya style pyramid, it's just a pile of rubble...

LINK-> http://en.wikipedia..../Complex_crater

Edited by Pax Unum, 23 May 2012 - 03:57 AM.


#5    Englishgent

Englishgent

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,909 posts
  • Joined:24 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bangkok Thailand

  • all dinosaurs are thin at one end, much, much thicker in the middle, then thin again at the far end -- Monty Python

Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:28 AM

View PostPax Unum, on 23 May 2012 - 03:54 AM, said:

Replying to bolded:



Tycho crater is an example

Posted Image

So a pile of rubble in the center of a crater isn't a Maya style pyramid, it's just a pile of rubble...

LINK-> http://en.wikipedia..../Complex_crater

Exactly.  :tu:    It is a natural occurence due to an impact by a meteor or asteroid. It is exactly the same effect as water dripping into a pool. . A central column appears immediately after the drip hits the pool of water. Same happens when a meteor strikes. :)


#6    badeskov

badeskov

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,194 posts
  • Joined:27 Aug 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please - Mark Twain

Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:29 AM

View PostEnglishgent, on 23 May 2012 - 04:28 AM, said:

Exactly.  :tu: It is a natural occurence due to an impact by a meteor or asteroid. It is exactly the same effect as water dripping into a pool. . A central column appears immediately after the drip hits the pool of water. Same happens when a meteor strikes. :)

Yeah...or try flour on a plate and a marble...same pattern, no mystery.

Cheers,
Badeskov

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.

#7    Hazzard

Hazzard

    Stellar Black Hole

  • Member
  • 11,757 posts
  • Joined:25 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside Voyager 1.

  • Being skeptical of the paranormal is a good thing.

Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:26 PM

What about the rest of your building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters?

Any pictures?

Edited by Hazzard, 23 May 2012 - 12:27 PM.

I still await the compelling Exhibit A.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. -Edmund Burke

#8    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:42 PM

View PostHazzard, on 23 May 2012 - 12:26 PM, said:

What about the rest of your building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters?

Any pictures?

I have seen some of these pictures, and I must say that Im not impressed. Most of them can be explained in other ways than ancient aliens or ET artifacts.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#9    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Unsafe at Any Speed

  • Member
  • 24,125 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Sea of Okhotsk

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 23 May 2012 - 08:21 PM

View Postnephilim12, on 22 May 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:

With many private lunar observers all over the world having access to powerful telescopes and filming what appear not to be natural structures, the latest pictures that flood the net were often dismissed as hoaxes until the Indian Space Research Organisation ( A fully Government agency ) released pictures of the lunar surface showing anomalies taken by their powerful imaging equipment.
This revelation is shocking for the public since agencies around the world had suppressed such information for the last 4 decades.
Any one can see these pictures in the official site of ISRO.
Most shocking are the presence of building shaped structures, the ruins of a cigar shaped massive spaceship estimated to be taller than the Eiffel tower, triangular markings, mayan style step pyramids in the centre of some craters, etc.
Check guys. We have a right to know what lies beyond.
And thousands and thousands of amateur astronomers have equipment that enables them to take a pretty good look at the Moon, and very very few have ever tried to claim that they've seen anything that They might want to hush up. Why is it only on "fringe" websites that this sensational news ever seems to be Revealed?
I must say it all sounds rather like that Apollo 20 hoax.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#10    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,083 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 24 May 2012 - 03:09 AM

OMG ! Im sold ! WHen do we go back ?

This is a Work in Progress!

#11    nephilim12

nephilim12

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 46 posts
  • Joined:21 May 2012

Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:14 AM

Uhuh yep. The gravity being a fraction of Earth's and the vacuum, no erosion or rather minimal.
i'm not entirely convinced, not even amused by these anomaly assumptions. After all, a bush in the moonlight can be a ferocious bear.
Strange though, the moon, so close to the earth, full of large craters, some several hundred kms wide, obviously meteor impacts. And none of them hit earth ? Just the moon. Even considering the earth's atmosphere and smaller meteors breaking up due to friction....
Is it chance we've consistently been so damn lucky throughout history ?
Well, we know of the Yucatan crater and recent  Tungaska incident only.
No crater in Tungaska though, just a forest area with 80 million trees flattened for 2000 sq kms, being a mid-air explosion supposedly 1000 times more powerful than Hiroshima.



#12    ChrLzs

ChrLzs

    Just a contributor..

  • Member
  • 2,991 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gold Coast (Qld, Australia)

  • I only floccinaucinihilipilificate
    when it IS worthless...

Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:11 AM

Quote

And none of them hit earth

????
Sigh.  We have an atmosphere and as you even point out, erosion.  This is a VERY well understood situation.  Seriously, you need to do some very basic research.



Anyway, before posting the links to these images*, nephilim, can you tell us what experience/knowledge you have about enlargement, and jpeg compression?


* In regard to posting those images - are you not planning to do so?  Seems strange that you would ignore that request, as you appear to have done. Please post a link to that which, in your opinion, is the very best example.  And I take it that will be a full-resolution, original and unprocessed image... The reason I say that will become clear...

___
All my posts about Apollo are dedicated to the memory of MID - who knew, lived and was an integral part of, Apollo.

#13    nephilim12

nephilim12

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 46 posts
  • Joined:21 May 2012

Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:14 PM

well u can google and scutinise the various links. The possibilities are various - 1. Edited hoaxes. 2. Private astronomers with access to equipment.
You be the judge in the meantime.


#14    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,200 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008
  • Gender:Male

  • Question everything

Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:53 PM

View Postnephilim12, on 24 May 2012 - 08:14 AM, said:

Uhuh yep. The gravity being a fraction of Earth's and the vacuum, no erosion or rather minimal.
i'm not entirely convinced, not even amused by these anomaly assumptions. After all, a bush in the moonlight can be a ferocious bear.
Strange though, the moon, so close to the earth, full of large craters, some several hundred kms wide, obviously meteor impacts. And none of them hit earth ? Just the moon. Even considering the earth's atmosphere and smaller meteors breaking up due to friction....
Is it chance we've consistently been so damn lucky throughout history ?
Well, we know of the Yucatan crater and recent  Tungaska incident only.
No crater in Tungaska though, just a forest area with 80 million trees flattened for 2000 sq kms, being a mid-air explosion supposedly 1000 times more powerful than Hiroshima.

http://en.wikipedia....raters_on_Earth

You said it yourself, little or no erosion, virtually no tectonic activity either, so no sublimation or subduction of craters into the landscape. And How old do you think most of the craters on the moon are?

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#15    Waspie_Dwarf

Waspie_Dwarf

    Space Cadet

  • 31,858 posts
  • Joined:03 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bexleyheath, Kent, UK

  • We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.

    Oscar Wilde

Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:22 PM

View Postnephilim12, on 24 May 2012 - 12:14 PM, said:

well u can google and scutinise the various links. The possibilities are various - 1. Edited hoaxes. 2. Private astronomers with access to equipment.
You be the judge in the meantime.
You haven't provided any links. How can people be sure they are looking at the same thing as tou unless YOU provide those links.

nephilim12, I strongly advise you to read this FAQ page on sourcing. I would particularly point out these parts:

Quote

Do I have to post sources when I present information in a post?
We do not have a specific requirement for members to provide source links to relevant data when making a claim or presenting factual statements in their posts however it is often a very good idea to do so whenever you can. If there are specific facts you are relying on in a discussion to support your argument and the provision of a source is possible then being able to provide one to back up those facts helps you to solidify your position and will go a long way to convincing others that your argument has merit. Obviously there are many cases where it isn't possible or practical to provide a source but where it is and where one is warranted then its a good idea to do so.

Why should I post a source - its up to everyone else to do research and validate what i'm saying
No it isn't, if you are making a claim that requires validation and you are able to provide it then it is generally up to you to do so; you are making the claim and therefore you need to back it up with sources if you want it to be taken seriously. Again while there is no strict enforcement of this if you are looking to convince others that your point is correct but are telling others that they will need to look up the facts themselves or to "do their homework" then you are unlikely to elicit much support.

Put simply, whilst you are not breaking any rules, do not expect to be taken seriously UNLESS you provide links.

"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-boggingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the street to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001

Posted Image
Click on button




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users