As for the "another astronomers view" statement, add onto that the word anonymous. I no longer give much credence to anonymous sources when it comes to UFO events. Take the anonymous whistle blower who supposedly phoned in from the base as another example of this.
Again, for those determined to cling to the mystery, there is plenty of fodder to draw from. You're welcome to keep this one in your "unexplained" bin if you'd prefer, but you'll find very little agreement on that assessment from me.
Fair enough. I do agree with the going round and round statement.....
I think that is a very accurate interpretation of my position Boon.