SC: Are you serious? Are you for real? How many verifiable facts on the Dream Stele are there to suppose that Rachaf crafted it? Let me tell you although I'm sure you already know - ONE partial inscription of 'Chaf'. That's it! This is exactly what I mean about Egyptology and its apologists cherry-picking its facts to suit its own agenda, its own paradigm. There is a Stele that exists, the Inventory Stele, with more facts inscribed onto it that are verifiable than the Dream Stele. But no - Egyptology cannot take the stele with the MOST factual information - it opts for the stele with the LEAST factual information. Why? Because of a single inscription 'Chaf' that allows them to link it to Rachaf (and it doesn't even say Rachaf built the thing).
Does this not even suggest to you in the slightest that something is seriously wrong here? If it doesn't then it should.
SC: And where there is a ruined temple with a long forgotten cult there is a new temple built on top. The AEs were good at doing things like that.
Edited by Scott Creighton, 04 June 2012 - 06:47 PM.