PersonFromPorlock, on 17 June 2012 - 05:42 PM, said:
Here's an interesting test: go to Google Maps, select "Panoramio" and look at where all the photos aren't - that's where Bigfoot might lurk undetected. Extreme Northern Burma, isolated patches of Siberia... that's about it if we rule out places like central Africa or South America where his presence has never been suggested. I think the walls are closing in on him, or the possibility of him....
That would be a good guess. But it really depends on how many cameras have been to some place. Just because someone was in the northern end of Canada and took pics along a 500 mile hike and posted them to google, does not mean that bigfoot would have had to have shown up sometime during the trip. Even if humans tromped on a piece of dirt 180 days out of the year, that is 50% of the time that no one is there.
Area to inhabit is not a bigfoot issue. Food is not a bigfoot issue. Finding a body or body part, or bones is the only real issue.
Edit: And there is the mapinguari which is supposed to be the South American bigfoot.
Edited by DieChecker, 19 June 2012 - 02:51 AM.
Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.
At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche
Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker