Yes they have. They've also set a precedent for telling the truth; does that likewise make some particular argument for the official 9/11 story for example more believable or evidenced? Why does whatever 'value' you are trying to get out of precedent work just one way?
Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.
900 replies to this topic
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users