hmm.. i don't even know exactly what i'm asking here? we're getting an influx of these B-grade quality movies that are mixing parts of the UFO and conspiracy "folklore" into their plots..
i'm just curious what others think of this? (assuming you've seen all those movies mentioned in topic title and more?)
it seems a similar thing to interviewing a yokel about a UFO sighting, then playing it on a major news channel.. it seems like the idea here is to associate the content with something 'lacking credibility'? ..the end result seems to be that the viewer walks away thinking something like "ahh, what a load of crap!"
it's just a little strange to me, that the (supposed) REAL avenues of all this are 'top secret', or even just simply discredited outright.. if the intent is to simply entertain then there are many ways to do this *without* adding bits and pieces of what are considered to be 'real life ufo/conspiracy folklore' (i hope this makes sense to somebody)
i know many things also facilitate this; the ease in which a home computer can now do video editing, the accessability of recording hardware, etc, the fact that there's always going to be a snake-oil seller, etc etc.. but why turn the scene into something that ends up having all the credibility and importance of keeping up with the kardashians, et al?
influx of B-grade quasi edu-tainment
area 51, defcon 2012, apollo 18, 4th kind, etc
Started by unit , Jul 25 2012 04:34 AM
Started by unit , Jul 25 2012 04:34 AM
3 replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











