Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 3 votes

Roswell: Two Crashes, Not One

roswell coverup

  • Please log in to reply
321 replies to this topic

#286    badeskov

badeskov

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,885 posts
  • Joined:27 Aug 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please - Mark Twain

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:32 AM

View Post1963, on 29 August 2012 - 01:38 AM, said:

Which illustrates the limits of your mind!...

Imagination is more important than knowledge... Albert Einstein
US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

Not at all, I can be as imaginative as the next person to the extent where science is still the determining factor.
      

Quote

And you will ultimately be proven correct my friend! :tu:

We can hope that you are correct.

Cheers,
Badeskov

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.

#287    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:34 AM

View PostKludge808, on 28 August 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

Okay, I tried to find it and I can't. Could someone fill me in on what LS's hypothesis is please?

This will be a help. LINK

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#288    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:36 AM

View PostKludge808, on 28 August 2012 - 07:07 PM, said:

We all have off days ... even me. ;)

Ahh, but you are not rude to people up front. Rye was. What goes around......

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#289    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:41 AM

View Post747400, on 28 August 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:

Ah, by "Robots" are you thinking in terms of R2D2 and C3P0 trundling about, is that the issue? No, I don't mean that the craft was crewed by Robots or anything like that (although the idea of a probe releasing smaller drones once it's reached its destination is one that is interesting), I mean that the craft itself may have been a robotic probe, either remotely piloted or probably more likely automated; incorporating a degree of Artifical Intelligernce perhaps.

More like the Von Braun, Leo and Balboa on Darwin 4 in Alien Planet I was thinking. But I guess there is not really a parameter, just artificial life.

View Post747400, on 28 August 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:

I wasn't belittling Lost Shamans Hypothesis, by the way; believe me, "imaginative" is a compliment. I'm always pleased to see people taking new and imaginative ways of looking at things.

It is not what I would call imaginative, some very good work as gone into it. Imaginative makes it sound like he made it up, when he didn't, he followed a paper trail.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#290    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:26 AM

View PostTheMacGuffin, on 28 August 2012 - 09:10 PM, said:

Just think about how far science has advanced on earth in a few hundred years, then try to picture what would be possible for civilizations even a few hundred or a few thousand years ahead of ours.  We can't--not really.

I have never been able to work with that, whilst we have made some marvellous industrial strides forward, we still have limits. Everything does, it's just the way things are. Like what happens when you run 100 meters in .0001 of a second, where does one go from there? How does one better an absolute?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#291    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:27 AM

View Postbadeskov, on 29 August 2012 - 03:32 AM, said:

Not at all, I can be as imaginative as the next person to the extent where science is still the determining factor.
  


We can hope that you are correct.

Cheers,
Badeskov


How ironic to use a phrase from the very man who determined the speed of light to pretend a faster speed is viable!

The mind boggles at times, really it does.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#292    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:29 AM

View PostTheMacGuffin, on 29 August 2012 - 12:46 AM, said:

I have always doubted very much that would be the final word in science, although maybe it was in the 1950s.  LOL

I really do not understand why, why do we feel that we can propel items with mass faster than those without mass?

Edited by psyche101, 29 August 2012 - 04:29 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#293    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:36 AM

View PostPYak76, on 28 August 2012 - 08:31 PM, said:

My "Personal" take on Roswell Crash is; The 1st Official Release of "A Saucer Shaped craft crashed today in Roswell, New Mexico" type headline is probably the closest to the truth. As they didnt really have a system for covering up UFO crashes that was widely known as far as I can tell from investiagtions. To be perfectly honest I and no one else will ever truly know as our Govts are so obsessed with keeping anything approaching the truth from us, that in all my years I can't really tell.

Lets try and be scientific in a speculative way. If we take the facts; The Milky Way is a barred spiral galaxy 100,000–120,000 light-years in diameter containing 200–400 billion stars. It may contain at least as many planets, with an estimated 10 billion of those orbiting in the habitable zone of their parent stars.

But how many galaxies are there in the entire Universe? ... The most current estimates guess that there are 100 to 200 billion galaxies in the Known Observable Universe...as Im sure you'll all agree there are probable a lot of Habitable planets with intelligent life. By Intelligent I will keep that to Inter-Galactic civilizations, but I am quite sure a few of them have made this apparently impossible feat possible by now, so IMHO I am sure we do have visiting inter-galactic/inter-dimensional beings visiting or planet! As with conservative estimates we have 100 Billion Galaxies with 100 Billion Stars in each this makes a HUGE # of solar systems, surely thinking this way makes these possibilities (UFOs), a good possibility.


It is reason for discussing Alien life, not alien life here. Another real world analogy for you. I am hoping you have heard of the Voyager program? The probes we sent out in the 70's. They are approaching the edge of our solar system just now. It will take a little more than 17,000 years to get one light year out from our solar system. 4 Light years and you can see proxima centauri, and no life there, the system is too young.

Where do you want to go next, and how many generations do you think it might take to get there? 1,000? 10,000? And that is travelling at a tidy 17 kilometers a second. Try doing that in the family wagon!

I would not call that viable travel.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#294    lost_shaman

lost_shaman

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,170 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:56 AM

View Postbadeskov, on 29 August 2012 - 03:31 AM, said:

We can always hope, but so far the speed of light limit rather stubbornly has prevailed. Maybe we can beat it, maybe we cannot. I certainly hope for the former, but wouldn't exclude the latter.

Cheers,
Badeskov

Hey badeskov,

I'm not sure what you mean by "beat it"? As far as Humans or Alienz traveling around the Galaxy, beating the speed of light barrier is just a matter of having enough energy to travel near the speed of light where Time slows so drastically that you could go anywhere in the Galaxy within a Human lifetime.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

#295    TheMacGuffin

TheMacGuffin

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,159 posts
  • Joined:30 Jun 2012

Posted 29 August 2012 - 05:33 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 29 August 2012 - 04:29 AM, said:

I really do not understand why, why do we feel that we can propel items with mass faster than those without mass?

My great grandmother went from the horse and buggy era to watching the Moon landings in 1969 in a single lifetime.  In her day, no one would have imagined such things were possible, since they didn't even have telephones, computers or electric lights.  Think of all the change that occurred in that very brief time, almost overnight, historically speaking.

I would be very hesitant to say what might be possible in 100 years or 1,000 years--just about anything, I suppose.


#296    TheMacGuffin

TheMacGuffin

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,159 posts
  • Joined:30 Jun 2012

Posted 29 August 2012 - 05:36 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 29 August 2012 - 04:36 AM, said:

I would not call that viable travel.

Neither would I.  It's literally the first generation of space technology, the earliest possible technology we could have used to do anything out there.  I doubt very much that it will be the last word in space technology, any more than the Model-T Ford was the last word in automobile travel.


#297    lost_shaman

lost_shaman

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,170 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 29 August 2012 - 05:50 AM

View PostPYak76, on 28 August 2012 - 08:31 PM, said:

My "Personal" take on Roswell Crash is; The 1st Official Release of "A Saucer Shaped craft crashed today in Roswell, New Mexico" type headline is probably the closest to the truth. As they didnt really have a system for covering up UFO crashes that was widely known as far as I can tell from investiagtions. To be perfectly honest I and no one else will ever truly know as our Govts are so obsessed with keeping anything approaching the truth from us, that in all my years I can't really tell.

Sure they did! This was just after WWII and there were Counter Intelligence teams based out of Wright Field who were highly adept at recovering enemy aircraft very often in secret. The commander of Wright Field had ordered a secret investigation of the phenomena on July 2nd a week before these events. Then there is the GAO report that says most wire traffic at the time from RAAF was between them and Wright Field. We even know that the high Brass was thinking about recovering a "Disk" because none other than Gen. Ramey and his Intel Chief were being quoted in the papers during the late August to July 2nd time frame making jokes about the "Disks" but also wishing "someone would put salt on the tail of one of these Disks and catch it...".

So yeah they could have recovered something in Secret, but it's more likely they just made up they story to fool and embarrass the Press to the point they they wouldn't report these sightings as they had been so vigorously, and indeed that is exactly what happened for over a year as after these events the Press by-and-large stopped reporting on Flying Saucers.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

#298    lost_shaman

lost_shaman

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,170 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 29 August 2012 - 06:06 AM

View PostTheMacGuffin, on 29 August 2012 - 05:36 AM, said:

Neither would I.  It's literally the first generation of space technology, the earliest possible technology we could have used to do anything out there.  I doubt very much that it will be the last word in space technology, any more than the Model-T Ford was the last word in automobile travel.

I agree. Those Probes were designed to go fast enough to get out of the Solar system but also slow enough to study the interesting things out there like the Planets and their Moons. Sure they are the fastest probes we've sent out so far, but that gets to much milage IMO. If we wanted to send a Probe just to travel interstellar space it would be designed right off the 'bat' to travel much, much faster than the Voyager probes.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

#299    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 06:27 AM

View Postlost_shaman, on 29 August 2012 - 04:56 AM, said:

Hey badeskov,

I'm not sure what you mean by "beat it"? As far as Humans or Alienz traveling around the Galaxy, beating the speed of light barrier is just a matter of having enough energy to travel near the speed of light where Time slows so drastically that you could go anywhere in the Galaxy within a Human lifetime.

Gidday LS

Interesting take as always mate. I wonder what a viable limit is? If we travel at c, then we need infinite energy and mass, so at 99% of c, the demand would still be unimaginable by our standards wouldn't they? 99% of infinite is quite a bit I imagine?

Cheers.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#300    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 29,824 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 29 August 2012 - 06:29 AM

View Postlost_shaman, on 29 August 2012 - 06:06 AM, said:

I agree. Those Probes were designed to go fast enough to get out of the Solar system but also slow enough to study the interesting things out there like the Planets and their Moons. Sure they are the fastest probes we've sent out so far, but that gets to much milage IMO. If we wanted to send a Probe just to travel interstellar space it would be designed right off the 'bat' to travel much, much faster than the Voyager probes.

Like Project Daedalus ;) Even it was designed to attain 12% of light speed and then shut of and cruise for another 46 years. It would have made it to Barnards star in 50 years. Still quite a wait for information.

Edited by psyche101, 29 August 2012 - 06:30 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.






Also tagged with roswell, coverup

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users