The Id3al Experience, on 07 August 2012 - 02:04 AM, said:
We can my friend I completely agree.
One problem. Power.
In the good old days, im sure we had more power as people. I beleive now we have none, we just think we do.
There are to many people out their that do not think for themselves, and the powers at the top rely on these people that have been through hell in life and do no understand that it is, the very people that 'help' them is the same reason they needed that help in the first place.
Kind Regards,
The idea is to create a hypothetical workable plan – put it through the critical thinking wringer as it grows and adjust accordingly.
It is a huge task which will require the input of many individuals and it come from the bottom layer of the hierarchal pile – namely us peons.
The illusion is that the power is in the hands of the prison administrators – governments etc and this pattern repeats itself through the layers of society down to the local government and admin.
The media often refers to ‘Government’ as if this was a separate entity from ‘the people’ which as you point out, has become the understanding.
So when – for example – we hear the expression “The Government will get such and such” we don’t think of us the people.
Now we know of the various conflicts happening in the Middle East where dictatorships are being challenged by the people and the people are demanding democracy as a better alternative, and we can agree that compared to what they have, it is a better alternative.
However it is not the best alternative. There is still gross inequality, and great dysfunction.
I remember when the ‘Occupy’ events were news. I remember seeing a smug wall street suit ask some of the protesters “what do you want” and various replies were forthcoming. The suit replied “So what is your plan – show me your plan.” There was silence to this request.
The simple reason for this is that we don’t have a plan – we want action, we want change and we expect the big guns to come up with something which is fair and just?
So – we need a plan which cannot deny us as democracy… ‘We The People’
So on that subject, it is necessary to approach such a task with the assumption that there is no conspiracy and work it from that angle – keep conspiracy out of the equation.
What we need at the end of this process is something which is foolproof as a model – in other words it can be seen as a workable alternative where no one is disadvantaged and it needs to be simple enough for the average person to understand.
When this is achieved then the internet can come into play as a medium for speeding the process of getting it out there – but that comes later on – we know that things can go viral so such a plan needs to have this in mind because it needs to be something which grabs the attention and support of as many as possible, the advantage being that most people are in the ‘disadvantaged’ category, even by their own estimate.
Before this can happen, the plan must grow enough and be circulated within forums, blogs and other such mediums in order for it to be added to, critiqued and supported by as many as possible.
It has to exclude ‘dreaminess’ – this is where critical thinking will come into play – the plan needs to be neutral in regard to any belief systems and pass the most sceptical analysis.
While the plan must envision the whole world, it must start within the context of the so-called free world of democracy which is to say that any such plan at the point of induction has to come from the free world and spread out as it will into the less democratic countries.
I have plenty of ideas which I think can work. Any concerns or criticisms can be addressed as they come, but those criticisms must also come from a place of non-conspiracy related foundations.
This is to say – anything not proven as an actuality in regard to free world government agenda cannot be used to argue against any such plan being realised.
Thoughts?