SSilhouette, on 06 November 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:
Then you wouldn't be satisfied with a jury's verdict on any case since most evidence is eyewitnesses. Thousands of eyewitness accounts are impressive enough for me. There seems to be something going on.
ok you don't seem to get it, do you...
it's not enough to just say 'this' or 'that' happened when in a debate. you are making a claim that has no concrete proof. that's fine if you're just talking out your @ss, but you are trying to make it fact here when it is not proven.
it's not that i want to discount what they are saying they experienced, i am simply trying to get at the so called facts you are presenting in this thread.
to begin with i don't see how the topic of nde's is even relevent to your claim that some 'ghosts' are mentally ill, never mind whether they (the ones who have the experience) are clinically dead or not at the time.
you are jumping around changing gears because your original argument is not going the way you would like.
being impressive enough for you is fine -
for you. it doesn't wash in a structured argument though, sorry. there may well be something going on but it's not tied in to what you're trying to imply here.