Jump to content


* * * * * 1 votes

When is capital punishment is justified?


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#31    Mr Right Wing

Mr Right Wing

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,638 posts
  • Joined:16 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 20 August 2012 - 07:44 PM

View Postjacobstiles, on 18 August 2012 - 03:14 PM, said:

How can we know if capital punishment is right or wrong? Where do we draw the line?

Feel free to voice your opinion.

The punishment should fit the crime.

If you steal someones possessions the state should come around and steals yours.
If you hit someone the state hits you.
If you commit GBH the state breaks your arms and legs.
If you rape someone the state cuts your balls off.
If you murder someone then you get punished with torture then executed.

Human rights should not apply to those that dont respect others human rights.

Edited by Mr Right Wing, 20 August 2012 - 07:45 PM.


#32    Antilles

Antilles

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 891 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:2nd star from the left

Posted 28 August 2012 - 07:10 AM

View PostPurplos, on 20 August 2012 - 06:00 PM, said:

I don't believe the justice system should be punitive. I believe its purpose should be to prevent crime. If someone murders someone and is likely to do it again, they should be kept away from society by whatever means necessary -- and least expensive -- whether that is lifetime imprisonment or death.

Very good post. I agree.

#33    spud the mackem

spud the mackem

    Spud the Mackem

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,882 posts
  • Joined:28 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yeo Valley,Darkest Somerset.

  • man who ask for nothing shall never be disappointed

Posted 28 August 2012 - 08:33 AM

British justice is far different from the U.S.A, life imprisonment in U.K. is 25 years or there abouts with time off for good behavior, life in U.S.A is life (maybe without parole), depending on whether the crime is premeditated,so we are debating different issues.
What happens if you kill someone accidently,there are no witnesses,but you will leave some D.N.A. at the scene,so do you turn yourself in,or not..You are a murderer by accident,you didnt mean to do it,but its on your concience forever,even if the other person meant to murder you.
All murderers should pay for their crime, but how do you define it ?.
I dont think that this question can be answered by any of us, but its an interesting subject.
(1) try your best, ............if that dont work.
(2) try your second best, ........if that dont work
(3) give up you aint gonna win

#34    A Shadow

A Shadow

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 661 posts
  • Joined:17 May 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 28 August 2012 - 09:53 AM

I dont think death can be justified. But what else can we do with them besides lock them up forever?



#35    wolfknight

wolfknight

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,658 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA Kentucky

  • There is nothing to Fear, but fear itself

Posted 28 August 2012 - 04:58 PM

If someone kills just to kill for the thill then yes. Serial killers yes. Murder is murder. A life for a life an eye for an eye. The punishment must fit the crime.  Or do we let a person sit on death role and spent 60,000 a year to house cloth,feed medical and dental care. Hang them all




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users