Mider, on 29 August 2012 - 07:09 AM, said:
Hah. I may be new here, but I am not new to...
*edited...skeptics.

I am a skeptic and I find your broad brush statement unwarranted and unfair. I see nothing wrong with critical thinking, and learning what facts fit a picture. I am just not the sort of person who finds imagination as satisfying as fact. To me ET on earth to explain that which we do not understand is just another Greek God
until he lands. The way ET is shoehorned into most cases is rather shameful IMHO. However I do love space with all passion, and I enjoy the concept of alien life, even Professor Hawking does. I do not see anything wrong with that at all. If I have a belief, it is that all things can be explained with enough time, effort and information. What I do not like is snake oil salesmen with very tall tales, and one is sticking ones head in the sand if one was to say that UFOlogy is not bulging at the sides with such. I would like tomorrow to be the day we find other life, but I do not think ET will be flying across space in one of those little flying saucers and I do not think initial contact will be personal. Between language barriers and quarantine, it would be nothing short of Russian Roulette to do so.
Edited by psyche101, 29 August 2012 - 09:25 AM.
Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research. There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs.