96 replies to this topic

[Antilles]

Mr Right Wing, on 06 September 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:

Harry is Hewitts double.

He looks so much alike that if it was any other person you'd be suspicious. As it is you dont want to see what is blatently obvious because you liked Diana.

Even after knowing of her numerous affairs. I'd have Wiliiam checked too as you never know she might have done the rounds at Buckingham Palace too.

Are you jealous?   Next you'll be telling us Paul Burrell was Will and Harry's father. I'm actually enjoying reading your nonsense.
I'm waiting for you to bring in alien abduction. Now that would be an interesting twist.

[mysticwerewolf]

my answer to the question is,   How many millions of people have beeen airbrushed from history for the sake of a few that manage to get their names in the books.
  History is written by the victors in war times. History is written by the living and most never even get their name in the books.
what was the name of the driver of her car. I couldn't tell you. in another 30 years it is doubtfull any one will even remember she had a driver. It is a shame but that is just the way things work in our world.
Not that it matters But 200 years from now no one will ever know i was alive, unless i somehow get turned into Buck Rodgers.

Edited by mysticwerewolf, 07 September 2012 - 07:48 AM.

[Antilles]

mysticwerewolf, on 07 September 2012 - 07:48 AM, said:

my answer to the question is,   How many millions of people have beeen airbrushed from history for the sake of a few that manage to get their names in the books.
  History is written by the victors in war times. History is written by the living and most never even get their name in the books.
what was the name of the driver of her car. I couldn't tell you. in another 30 years it is doubtfull any one will even remember she had a driver. It is a shame but that is just the way things work in our world.
Not that it matters But 200 years from now no one will ever know i was alive, unless i somehow get turned into Buck Rodgers.

Henri Paul

[Mr. Smith]

Meh, Not the best outcome for Diana but what do you expect when you marry a mobster from one of the oldest freeloading, extorting, and racketeering crime syndicates in the world?

[mysticwerewolf]

thanks antilles.  :-)

Edited by mysticwerewolf, 10 September 2012 - 11:58 PM.

[Mr Right Wing]

Mr. Smith, on 08 September 2012 - 03:50 PM, said:

Meh, Not the best outcome for Diana but what do you expect when you marry a mobster from one of the oldest freeloading, extorting, and racketeering crime syndicates in the world?

Off with your head.

You have not one peice of evidence that any of the Royals engage in mob behaviour. Its pure negativity aimed at them because you liked the rather adulturous Diania.

[Cradle of Fish]

What do the royals actually do? Except draw on taxpayer money and carry on as a relic of oppression and superiority?

[Mr Right Wing]

Cradle of Fish, on 11 September 2012 - 01:45 PM, said:

What do the royals actually do? Except draw on taxpayer money and carry on as a relic of oppression and superiority?

They bring in several billion above their cost every year through tourism.

They also protect the UK from Lord Protectors, are head of the military and use Lords to screen laws before they are passed as Acts.

[Kasey2601]

Why does focusing on the next generation of royals automatically mean that Diana is being erased from history? Are we supposed to focus on the queen and her children until they're all in the grave then turn to the next generation? I think what is happening is quite natural.

[tyrant lizard]

I never really liked Diana much to be honest. I'll agree she had a **** time of it with Charles, but you can't go round shagging guys behind the Heir to the throne's back and think you can get away with it.

I don't think she's being brushed out though, that's just what happens. The royals don't have any say what goes in the papers, they just have to get on with it like everyone else. If the press stop talking about her after fifteen years, so what? No one's still talking about Jimmy Stewart, Biggy Smallz, Mother Teresa, Varsace or Robert Mitchum. They all died the same time she did though.

Let's face it, Cliff Richards is still alive and making music, and he hasn't been in the papers for 15 years

[willowdreams]

Mr Right Wing, on 11 September 2012 - 08:38 AM, said:

Off with your head.

You have not one peice of evidence that any of the Royals engage in mob behaviour. Its pure negativity aimed at them because you liked the rather adulturous Diania.

hrmm.. why is it so bad for diana to have sex outside her marriage.. but not her husband? Why is it ok for him?  AND his woman was also married at the time..

[Mr Right Wing]

willowdreams, on 11 September 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:

hrmm.. why is it so bad for diana to have sex outside her marriage.. but not her husband? Why is it ok for him?  AND his woman was also married at the time..

Inside marriage, outside marriage, she was a trollop.

I would use the s..t word but its a chat forum.

[tyrant lizard]

Lilly, on 03 September 2012 - 01:53 PM, said:

Both Mr. Hewitt and Diana's brother are red haired men of Anglo-Saxon ancestry, Mr. Hewitt and Mr. Spencer look very similar. Therefore, the 'look alike' argument applied to Mr. Hewitt holds very little clout.

The most compelling factor IMO is that Diana met Hewitt after Harry's birth.

Surely you can't possibly know when they met, can you?

[rashore]

I don't really think Diana has been erased yet... She showed up all over the place when Will and Kate got married- I'm sure she will pop up again when they start having kids, or Harry gets married and starts having kids. There was just an article up today about how Will and Kate went to go see some orchid that was named after Diana.

I'm not sure why cheating on a spouse is a justification to be erased from memory, no matter who you are.

[King Fluffs]

I've heard many a conspiracy theory about Diana in my time.