OnlineCriticChick, on 17 September 2012 - 05:53 PM, said:
Yes, Im not quite sure what to think, but either way I stay open-minded and have learned to never say never. I have been reading up on this for the past few hours and it looks like it will go on into the night, so I will be back with what I learned

in the meantime heres a very interesting link that contradicts the hoax stories. Also, I havent had any experience with photoshop, I have never even had it or seen it, but if some of those pictures of a hoax then they are done very well, right down to the hole in the skull, the teeth missing, and the bones chipped and in the earth still being uncovered....in 10 yrs these photoshop pictures will be so good that we won;t believe anything unless we see it!
http://s8int.com/phile/giants21.html
I completely agree with the concept of keeping an open mind. That said, open minded doesn't just mean ready to believe, it also means ready to question.
The articles and books that were written (like the ones mentioned in the video you posted) were all based on very old local stories like so much of the "unexplained" is. For a long time, there weren't hard news papers and tabloids, the papers of the day were a combination of both. 150 years later, it's easy to go back and pick the crazy articles to base books on - as easy as it would be 150 years from now to go through issues of the Sun and put together a book describing how people in the US were constantly being abducted by aliens in the late 20th/early 21st century.
The sticking point for the giants as a race theories has been, is, and probably always be the lack of evidence. Look at the guy in your video - off the top of his head, he cites for or five such finds as if they were confirmed fact. If they were real, they would be. From the accounts I've read, 90% of the time the discoverers instanly turn around and rebury what would be the Anthropological find of the millennium and the other 1 in 10 either disappeaed from a traveling freakshow or local and unnamed scientist. To my knowledge, not one of these giant skulls with double rows of teeth and horns has ever made its way to someone with the credentials to confirm it.
If you bring this lack up, the usual response is that such a find would be such an earth shattering one from a scientific viewpoint that there is a conspiracy to block the evidence. This is absolutely silly. There have been massive, game changing discoveries in all branches of science and they all placed the accredited discoverer in the history books forever. Even in the 1800s when archaeology was mostly synonymous with treasure hunting, such a find would have drawn a stampede of researchers hoping to be the one credited with confirming it.
One of the fringe writers who pushes this "scared scientist protecting his precious preconceived notions" concept is Fritz Zimmerman. Here's a blog post where he explains how silly photoshopped giant images (one of which is the one you posted) are a plot by colleges to discredit the bible.
http://gianthumanske...-hoaxes-by.html