294 replies to this topic

[skyeagle409]

AN.UNNA.KI, on 24 September 2012 - 10:41 PM, said:

Again. What the heck is your point. I do need to be smart to see what is in front of my face. You on the other hand can't see passed your nose.

I will say this is the most impressive photo's yet. Let me ask you than. If you take all those parts. Plus the ones found outside. How much of that aircraft would you have?

What difference does that make? How much of PSA 1771 was recoverable?

[AN.UNNA.KI]

skyeagle409, on 24 September 2012 - 08:52 PM, said:

Looking at the wreckage outside the exit hole, that is clearly aircraft wreckage, which has nothing to do with a cruise missile.

How can you know what is from a missle and what is from a 757. There is not enough wreakage inside to be from a 757. Why did we not see significant parts of the 757 like these? Don't give me the BS about it slammed into the building. Most times the tail section survives. In your case even the tail section disapeared. really odd. If I did not know better I would think some faked the whole crash. Another thing. You guys made me watch a video showing that the757 crashed into the Pentago from above but the official reports say ground level. Which one is it.
Here you go . You guys don't seem to know what sizeable parts of a plane wraek are so look at these and see if you can find any like this. Most time the tail section survives. But not in your case even the tail vanished!

[skyeagle409]

AN.UNNA.KI, on 24 September 2012 - 11:09 PM, said:

How can you know what is from a missle and what is from a 757. There is not enough wreakage inside to be from a 757. Why did we not see significant parts of the 757 like these? Don't give me the BS about it slammed into the building. Most times the tail section survives. In your case even the tail section disapeared. really odd. If I did not know better I would think some faked the whole crash. Another thing. You guys made me watch a video showing that the757 crashed into the Pentago from above but the official reports say ground level. Which one is it.
Here you go . You guys don't seem to know what sizeable parts of a plane wraek are so look at these and see if you can find any like this. Most time the tail section survives. But not in your case even the tail vanished!

Once again, you showing your lack of knowledge. American 77 and United 93 impacted at very high airspeeds.

Now, tell us why the following crash site does not look like the crash sites you've posted.



This is a Tu-154, of the type that created the crash site above. Go ahead, and point out the seats, luggage, fuselage or tail section in the photo.

Edited by skyeagle409, 24 September 2012 - 11:18 PM.

[AN.UNNA.KI]

skyeagle409, on 24 September 2012 - 11:07 PM, said:

What difference does that make? How much of PSA 1771 was recoverable?

hey that flight of hero's went straight down. I think the estimated speed was somewhere around 800-900mph. That's twice your speed. and more was found there then at your site.

[AN.UNNA.KI]

skyeagle409, on 24 September 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:

Once again, you showing your lack of knowledge. American 77 and United 93 impacted at very high airspeeds.

Now, tell us why the following crash site does not look like the crash sites you've posted.

here we go again. What was the air speed of AA 77 when it impacted the Pentagon? And don't forget to find the pic's of large parts like the one's I just posted.

[AN.UNNA.KI]

skyeagle409, on 24 September 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:

Once again, you showing your lack of knowledge. American 77 and United 93 impacted at very high airspeeds.

Now, tell us why the following crash site does not look like the crash sites you've posted.



This is a Tu-154, of the type that created the crash site above.

And your point is?

[skyeagle409]

AN.UNNA.KI, on 24 September 2012 - 11:19 PM, said:

And your point is?

If an aircraft strikes the ground at a steep angle or a building at over 500 mph, you are not going to find an intact tail section or fuselage. The aircraft you have posted did not strike the ground in the same manner as United 93.

In the case of American 77, there is enough wreckage remaining to identify the aircraft as a B-757.

[synchronomy]

AN.UNNA.KI, on 24 September 2012 - 11:19 PM, said:

And your point is?

You are not even presenting and argument for your points nor are you engaging in debate.  You are simply contradicting every post made.
You are the one who originally made the outrageous claim when you started the topic...so why don't you present your case.
Why, after over a decade, are you bringing forth these accusations?
Conspiracy theorists started bringing forth all the accusations you are making here before the sun set on 9/11.

What do you hope to accomplish by digging up a horse that has been beaten to death long ago?

[AN.UNNA.KI]

synchronomy, on 24 September 2012 - 11:35 PM, said:

You are not even presenting and argument for your points nor are you engaging in debate.  You are simply contradicting every post made.
You are the one who originally made the outrageous claim when you started the topic...so why don't you present your case.
Why, after over a decade, are you bringing forth these accusations?
Conspiracy theorists started bringing forth all the accusations you are making here before the sun set on 9/11.

What do you hope to accomplish by digging up a horse that has been beaten to death long ago?

Because I was like you all those years. And one day I said I've had enough. I want to know the truth about 911. Plus I was interseted in 2012. So my reserch on 2012 led me to 911. So I got both at the same time. I have persented my case. There is no real solid proof of a 757 hitting the Pentagon. where is teh fuselage? Where is the tail section. I You guy's tell me they disintegrated. And you expect me to believe that? You believe it. All of the people I have been debating with believe it. how I do not know. But it does not add up. An ebtire 757 disintegrates. And don't tell me about those few parts that you have managed to find. They do not Make up 1% of the total mass of that plane. Where is the rest of it? Oh. Disintegrated
Get your info corrected. I have been at this computer for 2 daus debating. You need to start from the beggining.

[Daughter of the Nine Moons]

Thread closed for moderator review.

Edit to add: AN.UNNA.KI  you keep asking for evidence and claim to have received none yet there are 21 pages to the contrary which you have chosen to ignore. Quite rudely, I might add.

Given all the disruption and bickering in this thread there is little we can do to salvage a constructive discussion.

Thread closed.

Edited by Daughter of the Nine Moons, 25 September 2012 - 01:04 AM.
Thread closed