Jump to content

Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.

- - - - -

The Aquatic Ape theory

  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#61    Copasetic


    438579088 what am I?

  • Member
  • 4,238 posts
  • Joined:12 Apr 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 September 2012 - 03:44 PM

Imaginarynumber1 is correct. AAH is junk science. None of its claims stand up well to the slightest bit of scientific scrutiny. The explanations it "provides" are weak and lack evidence, which are explained much better by other models of human evolution.

This topic has been covered before:


#62    marc verhaegen

marc verhaegen

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Joined:26 May 2013

Posted 26 May 2013 - 12:10 PM

We did not descend from aquatic apes, of course, although our ancestors were anatomically & physiologically not adapted to running over open plains as some anthropologists still believe.
Instead, Pleistocene Homo populations simply followed the coasts & rivers in Africa & Eurasia (800 ka they even reached Flores >18 km overseas), google, eg, “econiche Homo”.
–eBook “Was Man more aquatic in the past?” introd.Phillip Tobias
–guest post at Greg Laden’s blog

#63    Hammerclaw


    Far Traveler

  • Member
  • 5,316 posts
  • Joined:08 Jul 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Tennessee, Just over the hill from Oak Ridge.

  • "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

Posted 26 May 2013 - 08:12 PM

Whistling in the dark can be an interesting vocation---provided one can carry a tune. There are about as many theories about the evolution of man as there are fictional dialogues of biblical tales. What we do know for a fact is; at some point in the history of our species, bipedalism and precise manual dexterity became necessary for it's survival. Our much vaunted intellectual capacity and brain size came some time after. We are a maritime species, something our anthropoid relatives have never "aped" with any measure of sucess, and in that we are unique. We mastered fire quite early on, so we could be called "fire apes", too. We are the species that contemplates it's own existence and asks why; perhaps our most unique characteristic of all.

Edited by hammerclaw, 26 May 2013 - 08:15 PM.

"An atheist, like a Christian, holds that we can know whether or not there is a God. The Christian holds that we can know there is a God; the atheist, that we can know there is not. The Agnostic suspends judgment, saying that there are not sufficient grounds either for affirmation or for denial."

#64    coolguy



  • Member
  • 2,393 posts
  • Joined:06 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:east islip , new york

  • Star trek rules

Posted 27 May 2013 - 04:04 AM

Yup it's all fake,

#65    docyabut2


    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,375 posts
  • Joined:12 Aug 2011

Posted 27 May 2013 - 09:39 AM

I `ve seen the mermaid show, but I think those were seals:)

Ok let me get this straight , we came from a fish that crawled upon land where the fins turn into legs, then we became a hairy mammel that hung in trees , right? but there`s that mouse deer a ancient mammel  that had hair that crawled back into the water and became the ansester of the whale.Some whales still have hair. A long process, but what if thats the short process of how we as mammels came out of the trees and adapted back into the waters by living, swimming, crossing the ocean waters and our bodies just became more aquatic.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users