Rut Roh, on 09 October 2012 - 07:36 PM, said:
As a practicing judo/jui jitsu player I can honestly say that adrenaline alone is enough to overcome a "wrist" or "arm" lock that has been executed to completion. Completion being popping the joint. Pain is something that only works on the willing or fearful. With an adrenaline dump going through someones system alone you are just as likely to piss them off as you are hurt them. Now lets add possible narcotic use on top of a situation and jui jitsu is a mute point and should only be attempted when the distance has been closed and is your LAST resort. UFC has rules the street doesn't. Subduing anyone hand to hand, regardless of size, is hard enough without the aid of a narcotic that will dull the senses and hence nullify pain as a reason for them to stop. Also, hard to apply said wrist or arm lock when someone is biting you. Again, rules are only for the ring. Hell, I fought for 4 minutes with a very dislocated shoulder on adrenaline alone. Didn't realize the severity of the injury until I walked off the mat and the pain kicked in within a couple of minutes.
He wasn't on pcp or this bath salts crap everyone is so hysterical about, he was on acid, tripping like a fool and it cost him his life. Instead of jumping on the cop/anti-cop bandwagon we should see the incident for what it is; a tragedy. For both parties. A family lost their son, a police officer is at risk of losing his livelihood.
Quote
Now, I agree with waiting for more info to come out to pass judgement, but it goes both ways. You cannot just assume the police overreacted to the situation and just popped off a cap to feel all manly about himself just like anyone else can't assume that the police didn't possibly over reach with the reaction. But unlike some, I tend to be a bit more lenient toward the officer, in cases like these, because of the aggravating factor of possible narcotics use.
I never assumed such a thing and I haven't seen anyone in this thread who appears to. Now reading the comments in the article is a different matter.
Quote
As for law enforcement training, the one thing I took from the academy that was numero uno on the list was officer safety. Hand to hand engagement is not about safety as much as it is about survival. If you have to use it, something along the way went wrong. Let me ask you this, if the officer in question goes through 2 or 3 different non-lethal weapons trying to subdue the suspect and he/she is walking through them, what is the officer supposed to do? What happens if an innocent bystander gets attacked because he/she was walking by while the officer is trying said tactics to no avail? Is it still the officers fault either way? It is real easy to Monday morning quarterback a situation the next day and not take into account all the variables that are current at the scene. Context is everything in these matters.
If a whack with a baton or a zap with a taser doesn't deter them then by all means use lethal force. But don't assume that just because someone is acting unusual that they're on whatever flavour of the month drug is making the rounds in the news. Excessive alcohol consumption has been making people act erratically for thousands of years. Psychadelics and disassosciatives can manifest erratic behavior in people too. And what about mental illness?
And if there were other officers on the scene they definitely could have subdued him, all you need to do is knock him over and sit on him.