psyche101, on 11 October 2012 - 10:43 PM, said:
I do not believe that for a second. Please show something to back that statement.
We are responsible for the survival of many species. I thought I was a cynical so and so. You are staring to make me look like Mary Poppins.
We have definitely destroyed more than we've fixed. We have taken huge amounts of forests down out of their natural cycle. Overfishing is a problem because we are fishing more than the fish can reproduce (coupled with other species getting tangled in the nets we don't eat). Poor management of waste in some countries have had a huge affect on the wildlife.
Not to mention pollution, the air quality over some cities is detrimental. Those species we "brought from the brink of extinction" were mostly in that situation because of us, from hunting to introduction of domesticated pets and pests. I could go on and on but we are trying to fix the problems we've caused, unfortunately not enough.
Some companies are thinking in the long term and recognise this problem and try to conserve what they use and make it more sustainable, others just want quick money and will have the world pay for their greed later on.
We rely on nature to live, you put it against its own order of things and it will throw it off balance.