30 replies to this topic

[Coffey]

Hilander, on 13 October 2012 - 11:41 PM, said:

I wish everyone would just leave the animals out of it.  They have been using dogs forever in wars and not much is said about that.

When they tally up the war dead they need to include the animals they use.

Well I've always been against that. No animals should be used in human wars. It's not fair on them when they don't have our idealogies or choice to sign up.

Don't people compare dogs etc to infants..... Lets start using infants in war shall we then? People wouldn't liek that, why a dog then?


War is medieval and pathetic enough without us dragging other animals into it.

[araxia]

Coffey, on 22 November 2012 - 01:05 PM, said:

Well I've always been against that. No animals should be used in human wars. It's not fair on them when they don't have our idealogies or choice to sign up.

Don't people compare dogs etc to infants..... Lets start using infants in war shall we then? People wouldn't liek that, why a dog then?


War is medieval and pathetic enough without us dragging other animals into it.

WARS are typical of the inability to talk,
world leaders WHO CANNOT TALK are like toddlers fresh in diapers using goo goo ga ga language,
they can't understand LANGUAGE,
THEY CANNOT reconcile peacefully,
because they CANNOT communicate....
if people could communicate with each other to resolve issues,
guns and mass destruction would have been totally unnecessary.