I get that, but seriously, what do "they" think has been missed in the past? This film has been digitized, re-digitized, stabilized, enhanced, double and triple enhanced, reverse imaged, and broken down into individual frame and I personally have seen several frame by frame motion analysis, even computer (stick-man) analysis and the bottom line is no two studies have come up with the same results yet. They can't even agree on how tall the creature is in the film.
So, again I ask, what exactly is it they think they're going to discover that's been missed after all these previous and rather detailed studies?
Edited by keninsc, 20 October 2012 - 11:52 AM.