The war is now over, our freedom was finally legally blessed, but times won’t stop being interesting.
The most intriguing details waiting to emerge are certainly the origin of “overuse of artillery” and “joint criminal enterprise” accusations, as well as huge geopolitical consequences these legal
novelties were supposed to bring.
Theodor Meron, the judge who threw these away, literally saved the future of my country and my sanity too.
If liberating our country was proven to be a “joint criminal enterprise”, if extremely cautious use of artillery while doing so was proven as an “overuse”, then the whole Homeland war would be stained as criminal and Serbian aggressor would hold on to that legal perversion in their never ceasing desire to “unite three Serbias in one”. (“Three Serbias” would be territories in Croatia, Bosnia and mainland Serbia, “wherever one Serbian grave could be found” – I quote Greater Serbian ideologists that stand behind this whole hell on Earth.)
The “evacuation” of Serbs was ordered and organized by Serbia (namely Milošević and his ilk, both ideological and military) and carried out by Serbian paramilitary forces, supported by JA (former JNA, Jugoslavenska armija, in nature illegally seized inventory of former JNA under Serbian command).
Documents that prove this with no shade of doubt – luckily – still exist, few months ago I translated one in one of the threads here (general evacuation order signed by Mile Martić, leader of illegal Serbian paramilitary forces in Croatia).
So, what possessed the prosecutor del Ponte to invent new crimes and judge Orie to accept them, not only as crimes existing in theory but also as proven crimes of the accused?
If Croats were savages and had orders to kill Serbian civilians during operation Oluja, it would be easy, genocide, therefore country made on genocide. If the artillery truly was overused, again, easy, country made on war crime. Greater Serbian ghouls would have legal ground to **** on our heads for another 100 years.
But, god damn it, Croats failed and while some of our towns were totalled by Serbian artillery, our artillery kept our towns virtually intact.
Of course, you idiots, why would Croatian army shell the crap out of our own towns? We are home here, remember? Unlike those who pulverized my hometown. And Carla del Ponte wasn’t motivated to persecute them, though they did overuse the artillery. Particularly on hospitals.
Remember Serbian general Ratko Mladić? Currently on trial in Hague, but not for war crimes in Croatia. No. No overuse of artillery, no murdered civilians, no joint criminal enterprise. Like he never set his hoof on Croatian soil. His trial drags on and on, for war crimes in Bosnia, but as far as ICTY is concerned, nothing happened in Croatia. Is that interesting or what?
The war was fought against Serbian aggressor force in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
No battle was fought in Serbia, not a fart was released on or towards Serbia.
Is it possible to hide that fact under pile of sentences that aim to equalize the guilt? Sure. With some immoral effort, you can not only whitewash the aggressor, you can also turn him into victim. And install him back in power, to rule over fourth (!) Yugoslavia. Over my dead body.
I can’t wait to get to know who, how, when, for how much and so on. Who wanted to draw new map of Europe on skin of Croatian generals?
And how come that oh, so clever plan failed so unceremoniously?
Maybe the **** avalanche (that can be heard starting in current president of UN General Assembly office) will somehow be stopped, but to be honest, I think I deserve to see that show. Think of it as small compensation for months under overused Serbian artillery that I've inexplicably survived. I forgive them air raids and small arms, but I'll never, ever forgive the artillery.
Edited by Helen of Annoy, 20 November 2012 - 08:02 PM.