Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#5401    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:52 PM

View Postseeder, on 20 January 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:

very crude attempt at diversion....you posted the skull, you insinuated the mystery, I as always provide evidence and facts

So great researcher, you post your silly fascination with skulls, you call yourself a researcher, yet why didn't you find the dna tests as per my efforts?  Rather keep your posts going huh?

you do no research, any evidence that trounces your ill gotten theories is ignored time after time


.

What DNA?

Are you saying that you have DNA evidence of the Paracus skulls?  If that is the case was Foerster wasting his time do you think?

All I found was that they ate fish and chips.  As I said that's as profound as modern archaeology gets.

I'm sorry to sound crass; just sick of reading modern archaeological mindless pap

Nothing in that report to indicate who these people were, and why they looked the way they did.  Pathetic.

Edited by zoser, 20 January 2013 - 01:08 PM.

Posted Image


#5402    topsecretresearch

topsecretresearch

    Astral Projection

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 692 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005

Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:58 PM

I believe it is possible that some ETs have visited earth in ancient times.


#5403    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    Is not a number!

  • Member
  • 9,940 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:00 PM

and I believe it's possible Atlantis existed.
Sadly, it's not about what we believe, but wht we can prove.


#5404    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,264 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:02 PM

View Postzoser, on 20 January 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:

There are walls all over the UK built of the same stuff.  A testament to intense labour, not high precision technology.

The latter is the basis for the visitor hypothesis.

PS I like your avatar name!

who was talking about the UK? I have provided ample evidence of the same style wall bullding asd found at PP all around the med.

and if you really really believe that no precision is used to build an arch...and then to build another on top of it....without any mortar..you really want to go get a check up from the neck up. I have no doubt on this statement alone you will get further ridiculed

anyway gotta go snowboarding while we have the snow...

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#5405    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:06 PM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 20 January 2013 - 01:00 PM, said:

and I believe it's possible Atlantis existed.
Sadly, it's not about what we believe, but wht we can prove.

I'm waiting for your proof against WoH.  Presumably you have it?

View Postseeder, on 20 January 2013 - 01:02 PM, said:

who was talking about the UK? I have provided ample evidence of the same style wall bullding asd found at PP all around the med.

and if you really really believe that no precision is used to build an arch...and then to build another on top of it....without any mortar..you really want to go get a check up from the neck up. I have no doubt on this statement alone you will get further ridiculed

anyway gotta go snowboarding while we have the snow...

No precision in those photographs.

Just like dry stone walls.

Posted Image


#5406    Crikey

Crikey

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 216 posts
  • Joined:09 Jan 2013

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:11 PM

Can  somebody tell me if my following appraisal of this thread is correct, based on what I've seen so far?-
With a breathtaking display of open-mindedness and fearlessness in pushing the envelope of modernistic out-of-the-box thinking, Zoser and his devotees are running rings round the rest of you close-minded neanderthals, is that a fair assessment?.. ;)

Edited by Crikey, 20 January 2013 - 01:13 PM.


#5407    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:21 PM

View PostCrikey, on 20 January 2013 - 01:11 PM, said:

Can  somebody tell me if my following appraisal of this thread is correct, based on what I've seen so far?-
With a breathtaking display of open-mindedness and fearlessness in pushing the envelope of modernistic out-of-the-box thinking, Zoser and his devotees are running rings round the rest of you close-minded neanderthals, is that a fair assessment?.. ;)

Thanks for the compliment; one small correction though.  I have no devotees other than maybe some silent observers.

It says to me that denial no longer works and that the mainstream explanations are rapidly losing credibility.  

Short of a space ship being dug up at the Coricancha this debate is done as far as I can see.

Posted Image


#5408    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Unsafe at Any Speed

  • Member
  • 24,126 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:26 PM

View PostCrikey, on 20 January 2013 - 01:11 PM, said:

Can somebody tell me if my following appraisal of this thread is correct, based on what I've seen so far?-
With a breathtaking display of open-mindedness and fearlessness in pushing the envelope of modernistic out-of-the-box thinking, Zoser and his devotees are running rings round the rest of you close-minded neanderthals, is that a fair assessment?.. ;)
Neanderthals? There were no neanderthals, they in fact were the ETs .

...hey, I think I might be on to something here ...

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#5409    Crikey

Crikey

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 216 posts
  • Joined:09 Jan 2013

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:46 PM

View Postzoser, on 20 January 2013 - 01:21 PM, said:

I have no devotees other than maybe some silent observers..

Too true mate, you never know who's up there in geostationary orbit monitoring this forum-
"God sits on the circle of the earth" (Isa 40:22)


#5410    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,089 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:10 PM

View PostCrikey, on 20 January 2013 - 01:11 PM, said:

Can  somebody tell me if my following appraisal of this thread is correct, based on what I've seen so far?-
With a breathtaking display of open-mindedness and fearlessness in pushing the envelope of modernistic out-of-the-box thinking, Zoser and his devotees are running rings round the rest of you close-minded neanderthals, is that a fair assessment?.. ;)

Then maybe you should reread this thread, and show us where you see a sign of close-mindedness.

I talk for myself here when I say I have posted several alternative ways to explain the things discussed here. ways none of you socalled 'open-minded' people ever even dreamt of because you solely rely on the words and videos of your YouTube guru.


#5411    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,089 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:20 PM

View Postzoser, on 20 January 2013 - 01:21 PM, said:

Thanks for the compliment; one small correction though.  I have no devotees other than maybe some silent observers.

It says to me that denial no longer works and that the mainstream explanations are rapidly losing credibility.  

Short of a space ship being dug up at the Coricancha this debate is done as far as I can see.

Denial of what? That it were aliens who built the Peruvian and Bolivian structures?

Throughout this whole thread you haven't posted a shred of evidence of alien intervention.

All you posted was  'Look at this, we can't so that. Ergo: aliens'.

And yes: a real spaceship beneath Sacsayhuaman or the Coricancha and so on would be the ultimate proof of aliens visiting in the past.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 20 January 2013 - 03:26 PM.


#5412    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:29 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 20 January 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:



And yes: a real spaceship beneath Sacsayhuaman or the Coricancha and so on would be the ultimate proof of aliens visiting in the past.

.

Not a likely scenario.

The best we have is the evidence they left behind that modern understanding can neither interpret or reproduce.

Apart from that we must wait for Foerster to complete his work.

Posted Image


#5413    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,089 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:16 PM

View Postzoser, on 20 January 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

Not a likely scenario.

The best we have is the evidence they left behind that modern understanding can neither interpret or reproduce.

Apart from that we must wait for Foerster to complete his work.

I don't expect a spaceship either, but wouldn't that be great news!

But I would settle for some unknown machine or contraption made of an unknown alloy using an unknown energy source, and preferably found inside or beneath one of these buildings.

"The best we have is the evidence they left behind that modern understanding can neither interpret or reproduce."

No, what you call 'evidence' are only artifacts and building blocks made and processed in a yet unknown way, not evidence of alien intervention.

And I think Davidovits experiments and theories will help us find out about the 'how'.

Google "Davidovits" AND "Geopolymer". The main criticism on his theory of chemically molding rock was that the crystalline structure of his artificially made blocks had a different crystalline structure of the blocks of the Egyptian pyramids. But - yep, I lost the link - I read that he had his blocks examined in a geological laboratory in France, and they concluded it was natural rock.

And then enter the same search terms in YouTube, and watch what he is able to do with his invention (or discovery).

Now I am not saying his experiments and theory prove the ancients used plant acids, but he sure has a strong point. If anything, he proved the ancients were capable of more than we give them credit for.


#5414    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:36 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 20 January 2013 - 04:16 PM, said:

No, what you call 'evidence' are only artifacts and building blocks made and processed in a yet unknown way, not evidence of alien intervention.


I'll settle for that admission from you Abe.  It's the first time you have said such a thing to my knowledge and it calls for a respect from me.

Rest assured you have that respect.  I also acknowledge the last part of your sentence so rest assured that I am not counting you to be among the converted just yet.

I would just offer some caution though on the geopolymer theory.  As I understand it, all it  seems to do is superimpose a more preferred science fiction based theory on top of a less preferred one.

Also I cannot see how it can be applied to quartz based rock.

Edited by zoser, 20 January 2013 - 04:40 PM.

Posted Image


#5415    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,089 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 20 January 2013 - 05:03 PM

View Postzoser, on 20 January 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:

I'll settle for that admission from you Abe. It's the first time you have said such a thing to my knowledge and it calls for a respect from me.

Rest assured you have that respect.  I also acknowledge the last part of your sentence so rest assured that I am not counting you to be among the converted just yet.

I would just offer some caution though on the geopolymer theory.  As I understand it, all it  seems to do is superimpose a more preferred science fiction based theory on top of a less preferred one.

Also I cannot see how it can be applied to quartz based rock.

I'm quite sure I have said the same thing a few times before.

And the Geopolymer theory is based on what the ancient Egyptians showed us, plus what the Peruvian Huankas did, plus what that Peruvian priest found out with his experiments with plants.

Add to that the accounts of people encountering some plant with fleshy, red leaves, a foot high, corroding their spurs and softening rock, in the Amazon jungle, and I think I am on the right track of finding out how it all was done.

--

Andesite is quartz based, but it also has a 6% amount of CaO (calcium oxide) which can be treated with oxalic acid, as I showed you before.

But then only the surface will be changed. altered, and that is that shine, that 'vitrification' you keep talking about.

.