Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#8086    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 03 March 2013 - 07:37 PM

View PostOniomancer, on 03 March 2013 - 07:33 PM, said:

Not philosophy, logic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

"Logic refers to both the study of modes ofreasoning (which are valid, and which are fallacious)[2][3] and the use of valid reasoning. In the latter sense, logic is used in most intellectual activities, including philosophy and science, but in the first sense, is primarily studied in the disciplines of philosophy, mathematics, semantics, and computer science. "


logic is used in philosophy but it is not exclusively of it. It is a means to an end, as a system for reasoning correctly. Every time you talk about reason, that's what you're attempting to describe.  I say attempting because the majority of your arguments are dead in the water without even taking the so-called evidence into account because most of your reasoning is inherently logically incorrect.  You call it hiding but if you were ever in a formal debate,  this is the language it would be coached in and you would barely be able to take a step without getting called out on it.

How does philosophy explain this?

Posted Image

Posted Image


#8087    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 03 March 2013 - 07:39 PM

View Postbadeskov, on 03 March 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:

Or using the equivalent of sand paper...

Cheers,
Badeskov

Yes maybe they nipped down to Wall Mart and while they were there returned the diamond tipped cutting tools.

Posted Image


#8088    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 03 March 2013 - 07:44 PM

View Postzoser, on 03 March 2013 - 07:00 PM, said:

There are marks were the cutting suddenly stopped:

Look at the bottom of the cut.



No natural phenomena can do that to granite.

Some high frequency vibratory device did that.  I wouldn't rule out wire even at ultra high frequency.

You keep saying it but you're not proving it. I'm not seeing a cut, I'm seeing a nick at most, if even. And what if the blade itself was tapered, hmm?

Quote

Here is the other end of the cut.  Evidence of tool marks near the every bottom of the cut.

According to whom?

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#8089    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 03 March 2013 - 07:47 PM

View Postzoser, on 03 March 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:

How does philosophy explain this?

Posted Image

Philosophy is mum, not having a horse in this race. Logic says look at the amount of light hitting the two separate areas of stone.

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#8090    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 03 March 2013 - 07:53 PM

View PostOniomancer, on 03 March 2013 - 07:47 PM, said:

Philosophy is mum, not having a horse in this race. Logic says look at the amount of light hitting the two separate areas of stone.

Those two areas display different cut widths.  It's no trickery.

Look at the original clip above if you don't believe me.

Both thicknesses however are far too narrow for a soft metal saw.

It would shred after only a few cycles.  The teeth would flatten in seconds.

Posted Image


#8091    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 03 March 2013 - 08:18 PM

View Postzoser, on 03 March 2013 - 07:53 PM, said:

Those two areas display different cut widths.  It's no trickery.

Look at the original clip above if you don't believe me.

0:50, try again. 1:05, the lower portion doesn't even go through the rock. It's a surface cut and it's the same width as the upper cut.

Quote

Both thicknesses however are far too narrow for a soft metal saw.
It would shred after only a few cycles.  The teeth would flatten in seconds.

And you know this how? And who said anything about teeth?

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#8092    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 03 March 2013 - 08:52 PM

View PostOniomancer, on 03 March 2013 - 08:18 PM, said:

0:50, try again. 1:05, the lower portion doesn't even go through the rock. It's a surface cut and it's the same width as the upper cut.



And you know this how? And who said anything about teeth?

Check out the very beginning of the video.

It shows the LH side of the block.

Posted Image

Now check out the RH side of the block at the end of the footage on this stone:

Posted Image

Definitely wider on the RH side.

Your second point.

No teeth no cut.

Obvious isn't it?

Anything abrasive such as sand is only going to shred the material.  Soft doesn't cut hard unless vast quantities are thrown at it resulting in a ridiculous usage rate.   Basic law of physics.

Edited by zoser, 03 March 2013 - 08:53 PM.

Posted Image


#8093    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 03 March 2013 - 09:30 PM

View Postzoser, on 03 March 2013 - 08:52 PM, said:

Check out the very beginning of the video.

It shows the LH side of the block.



Now check out the RH side of the block at the end of the footage on this stone:



Definitely wider on the RH side.

0:34, what does he say? "it's even all the way through"

Quote

Your second point.

No teeth no cut.

Obvious isn't it?

Anything abrasive such as sand is only going to shred the material.  Soft doesn't cut hard unless vast quantities are thrown at it resulting in a ridiculous usage rate.   Basic law of physics.

Trolling, or more of that famous short attention span of yours? Stocks' saw did not have teeth. Stocks' saw did not "shred". The usage ratio was 1-3 mm.
Hardly rediculous. All old, old news for this thread.

Now we know that other means than cutting were used to shape rocks, so how much cutting was actually done? I'm betting it was no where near enough to bankrupt their copper supply. Not to mention they also had bronze besides the copper. Those figures are just for stocks' method too. How do we know the AE didn't have a more efficient method?

Oh, and zoser? The copper is not doing the cutting! Get that through your head!

There, I said it. I feel better.

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#8094    third_eye

third_eye

    _ M Ġ ń Ř Ī Ş_

  • Member
  • 7,523 posts
  • Joined:06 Nov 2010

Posted 03 March 2013 - 11:56 PM

View PostOniomancer, on 03 March 2013 - 05:45 PM, said:

Have you ever tried to get pitch, tar or old glue off from something? it's next to impossible without solvents.


Usually I just burn them off over a hot fire ...

Quote


You realize you're pulling a zoser here and arguing against something that's already been demonstrated?


tar, pitch and natural glues won't help the saw blade move any easier or even hold any abrasives well enough to be useful, the bind is just not effective enough on stone. Can't see that happening, that's usually the problem with sawing or chopping down trees or shrubs, the sap dries on the blade making it unusable, should apply to stone too I expect.


Quote


Jadeite, mohs 6.5-7.  That puts it in quartz range.

These are shoestring operations. If they're using a hand saw instead of a power saw, they're probably just using the cheapest basic abrasive available and whatever oil they've got handy.


If the stone is of value, using power saws is too costly in terms of waste from the heavy grind width cut, just even a half inch width of a cut on a big stone equals a lot of loss. Better slow and gently to minimize loss. The bigger the piece intact the higher the value too, and power tools are too harsh, the risks of compromising the end quality thus again reducing value.

Not pulling a zoser, I know for sure no aliens did do it :lol:

Quote

' ... life and death carry on as they always have ~ and always will, only the dreamer is gone ~ behind the flow of imagination, beyond any effort to be still
dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions, only the dreamer is gone ~ the dream never ends
'

GIFTS WITH NO GIVER - a love affair with truth ~ Poems by Nirmala

third_eye ' s cavern ~ bring own beer


#8095    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,109 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:34 AM

Zoser, you found anything, yet?

View PostAbramelin, on 03 March 2013 - 06:03 PM, said:

You still have not posted a shred of evidence of alien involvement.

When did you plan to post about that? We have been waiting for hundreds of pages.

Experiments involving bronze tools have been done. Check.

Experiments involving pounding rock with rock have been done. Check.

Drilling with 'primitive tools'  have been done. Check.

Experiments with chemical molding have been done. Check.


Now finally show us and experiment involving your 'alien technology'.

You can't because you have not the faintest clue, like your guru, the tour guide who is wandering around like Alice in Wonderland..



#8096    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,109 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:36 AM

Did you find the location of that rock yet?



View PostAbramelin, on 03 March 2013 - 06:11 PM, said:

You need to show us the location of that rock, relative to its environment.

And the first photo shows the hole for a wedge.

Coincidence??



#8097    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,500 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005

Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:45 AM

View Postzoser, on 03 March 2013 - 08:52 PM, said:

Basic law of physics.

I would say you should not have thrown away your textbooks. What are you doing with such heresy.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#8098    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,109 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 04 March 2013 - 01:16 AM

Zoser is having us on.

My English is lacking here, so maybe I used a wrong expression.

I want him to show a YouTube video (his kind of proof) showing us alien tools, and aliens at work in South America.

If not, I have nothing to add to this thread anymore.

We all have shown him how things could have been done, but he has never shown us how aliens could have done it.

Maybe our ideas, theories, and videos were not to his liking and didn't explain things in the way he preferred, but at least we tried.

He never did, not one single time in this thread.

We may not yet understand how the ancients built what they built, but that is NO proof of alien intervention.

That is merely proof of not yet knowing how it was done, but not proof of aliens.


#8099    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:23 AM

View Postthird_eye, on 03 March 2013 - 11:56 PM, said:


Usually I just burn them off over a hot fire ...

o_O You must have tough hands. Remind me never to hire you to refinish furniture either.

Quote

tar, pitch and natural glues won't help the saw blade move any easier or even hold any abrasives well enough to be useful, the bind is just not effective enough on stone. Can't see that happening, that's usually the problem with sawing or chopping down trees or shrubs, the sap dries on the blade making it unusable, should apply to stone too I expect.

They're strong enough that they were used to secure spear heads and drill points, etc. I would think cutting stone would be different than cutting wood. The biggest problem with wood saws is it gums up the cutting edge. I found too a fine coat of dirt blocks any residual stickiness.

I was referring to copper and grit alone BTW, which has been demonstrated by stocks.

Quote

If the stone is of value, using power saws is too costly in terms of waste from the heavy grind width cut, just even a half inch width of a cut on a big stone equals a lot of loss. Better slow and gently to minimize loss. The bigger the piece intact the higher the value too, and power tools are too harsh, the risks of compromising the end quality thus again reducing value.

Power saws are the way it's normally cut in the rest of the world. The blade can be quite thin and the saws are water lubricated. They give pretty fine cuts.

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#8100    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,499 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:17 AM

Speaketh Wiki about sandpaper: The first recorded instance of sandpaper was in 13th century China when crushed shells, seeds, and sand were bonded to parchment using natural gum.
Shark skin was also used as a sandpaper. The rough scales of the living fossil Coelacanth are used by the natives of Comoros as sandpaper.[2]

Boiled and dried, the rough horsetail is used in Japan as a traditional polishing material, finer than sandpaper.


So has anyone tried to sand a stone using a shark? How hard is it?


I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.