10148 replies to this topic

[third_eye]

seeder, on 06 March 2013 - 11:16 PM, said:

Yes. Its not an ancient site even. He had the pulley. Nothing to do with the AA theory at all so posted in the wrong place
.

Well if Ed did it, it means no AA tech necessary

[CrimsonKing]

seeder, on 06 March 2013 - 11:16 PM, said:

Yes. Its not an ancient site even. He had the pulley. Nothing to do with the AA theory at all so posted in the wrong place






.

LIES seeder this has AA written all over it!You just refuse to see it hahaha

[Slave2Fate]

scowl, on 06 March 2013 - 11:15 PM, said:

That's more likely to happen than Ancient Aliens returning to Earth and doing it.

I need a new hobby anyway, idle hands and all that...

[Abramelin]

Wearer of Hats, on 06 March 2013 - 09:32 PM, said:

How heavy are the blocks in the Parthenon?

May I, may I, may I??

60 tonnes each, and many of them. Well, those smoothly carved and tall pillars that is.

++

EDIT:

Oh damn, that is the Roman thing. Sorry.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 07 March 2013 - 12:58 AM.

[Abramelin]

zoser, on 06 March 2013 - 06:26 PM, said:

Just watched this again.

The Russians have the whole thing stitched up.

They have visited sites across the world including many not normally accessible to tourists in Egypt.

Their conclusions are very clear.  An independent team of experts have made the same conclusions as other investigators.

Ancient high tech.  Ancient visitors.

See for yourselves.

Advanced Ancient Civilizations - Results of the LAH Expeditions 2004-2011 English Translation

I have watched that video many times, and it is nice to see someone jump to conclusions that fast.

[lightly]

seeder, on 06 March 2013 - 01:39 PM, said:

Your best bet is to google them up. So many links and pics have been posted - I for one have lost count of whats posted and where/when etc. But what is it you are trying to understand?

Thanks seeder..   i'm wondering if all of oddly shaped puffy faced stonework is as you described above,   "a facade",  or if some are fitted throughout the width of the wall. ? get what i mean?
   I've googled till the googs came home and i can't seem to find pictures of  dismantled walls  so i can see the sides and tops and bottoms of the stones.


   *

Edited by lightly, 07 March 2013 - 01:40 AM.

[TheSearcher]

third_eye, on 06 March 2013 - 11:19 PM, said:

Well if Ed did it, it means no AA tech necessary

Isn't that what we all have been saying, with one or two notable exceptions that is.

[third_eye]

TheSearcher, on 07 March 2013 - 09:28 AM, said:

Isn't that what we all have been saying, with one or two notable exceptions that is.

We know Ed did it, the point of contention is that we are still not sure 'how' Ed did it, Mr Wallington might have an idea but nobody can say for sure.

[Harte]

zoser, on 04 March 2013 - 08:52 PM, said:

No further comment required.

Thank God for that. Now I won't have to ignore you anymore.

Harte

[seeder]

Wearer of Hats, on 06 March 2013 - 09:32 PM, said:

How heavy are the blocks in the Parthenon?

seeing as peeps like vids I got you one ... at just 1.43ms they start speaking of 'unmatched quality and precision'...you get to see parts of it being dismantled by CRANE...so you do get a feel for the size of the blocks.  The guys working on it cant...use modern tools so well so need to try figure out how the ancients did it....zoser may learn somethings after all





1000 years before the Indians in Bolivia  




.

Edited by seeder, 07 March 2013 - 06:00 PM.

[the L]

Seracher & Seeder
Maybe you already posted it in this thread but I didnt follow all the way.
I dont know that pre Inca cultures were in iron age. What is evidence for such claim?

Edited by the L, 07 March 2013 - 06:23 PM.

[seeder]

the L, on 07 March 2013 - 06:22 PM, said:

Seracher & Seeder
Maybe you already posted it in this thread but I didnt follow all the way.
I dont know that pre Inca cultures were in iron age. What is evidence for such claim?

y

You only need to go back a few pages till you see images of copper/bronze axes etc and my link, searcher found the iron tools and links to it also

Who is to say FOR SURE what they used? They were known to trade alot with other people.... and had strong trade routes. In short we may never know for sure

Id already found this great link too, - about the Ore mine

http://www.livescien...can-empire.html




.

Edited by seeder, 07 March 2013 - 06:32 PM.

[third_eye]

We know what they used .... just don't know how they used what they had so well ... on the other hand .... sell them a power saw tool and they'll tell you to go fly a kite

they wouldn't be able to build what they did with a power saw tool

[seeder]

seeder, on 07 March 2013 - 05:57 PM, said:

seeing as peeps like vids I got you one ... at just 1.43ms they start speaking of 'unmatched quality and precision'...you get to see parts of it being dismantled by CRANE...so you do get a feel for the size of the blocks.  The guys working on it cant...use modern tools so well so need to try figure out how the ancients did it....zoser may learn somethings after all



1000 years before the Indians in Bolivia  

.

and at 36.50, the vid shows a joint 'so precise', its much thinner than a human hair...and in fact it gets SO precise, in the end the join gets invisible...

Now thats precision unseen in Bolivia   yet the ancient Greeks didnt cry 'aliens did it'




.

Edited by seeder, 07 March 2013 - 07:22 PM.

[third_eye]

okay ... this is what you should know of how the things the ancients did :
 chart.jpg   59.71K   15 downloads

Its simple and effective and replicable

number one is getting irregular sides to match up, one end of the measuring stick guides the drawing the edge to be cut from the adjacent block

number two is sawing effectively, saw from B to a depth then the sides are chipped off with chisels or anything hard enough at A , rinse, dry and repeat, the saw start again to a deeper level then the chisels take over, chipping off the sawed edge, no limits to the size of the block that needs sawing

number three is showing that ONLY the touching sides needs to line up for precise placement, the center is left alone as long as it doesn't get in the way


now you may scale the stones up as big as you are confident of moving

~edit : update ... I got my A and B wrong on example number 2

corrected and I apologise


Is this how they did it ?
I don't know, but this is how it has been done

Edited by third_eye, 07 March 2013 - 08:44 PM.