Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#8416    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 08:54 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 10 March 2013 - 06:51 AM, said:


and there is no evidence that it was done by aliens..

Fairies perhaps?

Posted Image


#8417    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 08:56 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 10 March 2013 - 07:09 AM, said:

just a few more natural rocks..

Posted Image

do you notice zoser.. how straight the edges are.. and how flat the surface is?

how did they do that..

I guess mother nature had alien help as well..

Brilliant Dingo.  Once again you have answered everything the LAH Team and every other AA proponent ever wanted to know.

A shear genius in all respects.

Well done.

:ph34r:

Posted Image


#8418    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:00 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 10 March 2013 - 06:59 AM, said:

just on a side note.. can you explain these zoser?

Posted Image

Posted Image

notice the shape of the circles..

Posted Image

now wouldnt you say.. if that was cut into a stone block.. that the dimples were pressed into stone?

And the other half a dozen types of moulding phenomena?  Where are they?  The trowel marks, the obvious smoothing, the smudge marks, the pointing, if you would like me to repost them please let me know.

It's this kind of extremely feeble effort that tells me and others no doubt that you have not a hope in hell of coming up with answers.

There are none.

Find examples of the other phenomena if you can.

Preferably on known constructions.

All you have demonstrated is examples of erosion.  Not moulding,

Edited by zoser, 10 March 2013 - 09:07 AM.

Posted Image


#8419    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Mainly Spherical in Shape

  • Member
  • 25,055 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:10 AM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 09:00 AM, said:

And the other half a dozen types of moulding phenomena?  Where are they?  The trowel marks, the obvious smoothing, the smudge marks, the pointing, if you would like me to repost them please let me know.

It's this kind of extremely feeble effort that tells me and others no doubt that you have not a hope in hell of coming up with answers.

There are none.

Find examples of the other phenomena if you can.

Preferably on known constructions.
What i've never understood is how you equate this with Incredible precision, and so you can argue that it's all evidence for the same thing. Surely trowel marks, and smudge marks, and places where (so you claim) they poked it and didn't bother to smooth it out, and so on, and cobbled walls together from stones of all sorts of shapes & sizes and stuck them together in any way they'd fit; doesn't all this rather suggest an Incredible ancient bodge rather than Incredible ancient precision?

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#8420    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:22 AM

Just in case you forgot what the moulding marks look like.

Here they are again.  Absolutely nothing like yours Dingo.

I would add that this is what the skeptics have been doing for 500 pages here now.  Abe did it with his chemicals, Mr O did it with Stocks and Potzen and Seeder does it with the Parthenon.

Your posts are all so easy to refute because you are not comparing the exact phenomena.  Very simple.

You seem to think that if you post anything remotely related that it will answer the problem, fully.

Of course it is not that simple.

The rest of the 500 pages is just shouting, complaining and insults.

Now find if you can phenomena resembling this on known constructions (not erosion, that is easy to detect).

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image


#8421    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,776 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:30 AM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 08:54 AM, said:

Fairies perhaps?
makes sense, they're expert stone builders, anythig that uses iron would obviously be off the cards for them (iron being for them like arsnic is for us), they'd build in places that are of some "higher importance", often in remote locations and/or locations of spiritual significance.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#8422    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:31 AM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 10 March 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:

What i've never understood is how you equate this with Incredible precision, and so you can argue that it's all evidence for the same thing. Surely trowel marks, and smudge marks, and places where (so you claim) they poked it and didn't bother to smooth it out, and so on, and cobbled walls together from stones of all sorts of shapes & sizes and stuck them together in any way they'd fit; doesn't all this rather suggest an Incredible ancient bodge rather than Incredible ancient precision?

I don't understand your point LV.

Here is precision:

Posted Image

Posted Image

Undeniable, never replicated by modern man, Romans, Greeks, Renaissance, only by the Ancient Egyptians.

Precision like this was easily possible in blocks ranging from 0.25 tonne to 200 tonne or even heavier.

Then you seem to be pointing out the contradiction between the joins which are precise, and the exterior faces which have mould marks?

Well that just says to me that it was the joins that were the crucial thing.  They didn't need perfect exterior faces.

I don't see a contradiction at all.  It was a matter of requirement.

Edited by zoser, 10 March 2013 - 09:33 AM.

Posted Image


#8423    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,776 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:34 AM

FFS man, we've pointed to buildings with similar "precision joins".
You just ignore us.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#8424    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:45 AM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 10 March 2013 - 09:34 AM, said:

FFS man, we've pointed to buildings with similar "precision joins".
You just ignore us.

Care to post them again or are you just happy to make groundless claims?

Sorry to be blunt, but nothing I have seen resembles the above precision.

Be back in about 10 minutes with some other examples.

Posted Image


#8425    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,182 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:55 AM

see how he baits people?  pointless even responding.....

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#8426    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:03 AM

View Postseeder, on 10 March 2013 - 09:55 AM, said:

see how he baits people?  pointless even responding.....

Show me the evidence seeder.

I show you mine.

Please don't show me sausages and then claim it's steak.

Posted Image


#8427    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:07 AM

Here's steak not sausages.

From the video on page 556.

Posted Image

The same precision continues around the corner.  It is 3 dimensional precision if you watch the video clip.

Posted Image

Challenge to WOH and seeder.

Find where this was equalled in classical times with crude tools.

And for seeder:

This is not baiting.

There simply is far more evidence in support than against.

That's why this is easy for me to do.

The evidence is everywhere.

Posted Image


#8428    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Mainly Spherical in Shape

  • Member
  • 25,055 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:19 AM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 09:31 AM, said:

I don't understand your point LV.

Here is precision:




Undeniable, never replicated by modern man, Romans, Greeks, Renaissance, only by the Ancient Egyptians.

Precision like this was easily possible in blocks ranging from 0.25 tonne to 200 tonne or even heavier.

Then you seem to be pointing out the contradiction between the joins which are precise, and the exterior faces which have mould marks?

Well that just says to me that it was the joins that were the crucial thing.  They didn't need perfect exterior faces.

I don't see a contradiction at all.  It was a matter of requirement.
it's designed to be functional rather than necessarily aesthetic. I see your point, yes.

Edited by Lord Vetinari, 10 March 2013 - 10:19 AM.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#8429    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,776 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:29 AM

The columns of the Parthenon are not one solid lump of marble.
Each weigh several tonnes.
The Taj Mahal doesn't use cement (iirc).
Ankor Wat was build ON a swamp.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#8430    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:44 AM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 10 March 2013 - 10:29 AM, said:

The columns of the Parthenon are not one solid lump of marble.
Each weigh several tonnes.
The Taj Mahal doesn't use cement (iirc).
Ankor Wat was build ON a swamp.

Thanks for the information.

Any time you are ready show me the precision (granite of course).


Otherwise I have given you steak and you have replied with sausages.

Edited by zoser, 10 March 2013 - 10:44 AM.

Posted Image