Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#8431    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    Is not a number!

  • Member
  • 9,673 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:50 AM

Sadly Zoser, your central preposition is flawed.
It wasn't aliens. You were right when you said faeries. They built them all. Sometimes they built the buildings for men, sometimes they didn't.

You're presenting sausages but the reality is chocolate mudcake.


#8432    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 11:12 AM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 10 March 2013 - 10:50 AM, said:

Sadly Zoser, your central preposition is flawed.
It wasn't aliens. You were right when you said faeries. They built them all. Sometimes they built the buildings for men, sometimes they didn't.

You're presenting sausages but the reality is chocolate mudcake.

So there is no evidence of precision granite work to that standard in classical times despite all the labour that was available.

The stone masons of our time cannot replicate it either.  Roger Hopkins is on record as stating that even with modern machine tools he would not even try.

And you think it was all done by indians with copper tools and dolerite pounders?

And you think that is serious.

Well many there are my friend that will see nothing but a joke in that.

Ancient high technology is a fact and has not been refuted on this thread.

If it could be you would do it right now instead of resorting to cynicism.

I have the images.

You have cynicism.

Enough said.

Posted Image


#8433    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    Is not a number!

  • Member
  • 9,673 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 11:51 AM

no Zoser, I think it was done by beings from the Never-Never who were paid with saucers of milk, kind words, promises of future services and the odd swapped child.

You're the one with the preposterous idea it was aliens. We've millennia of history with the Fair Folk. We know they're master builders. Your "aliens" can't even be bothered to show up for a chat with the locals, whereas the Fair Folk are well known in the locale of their edifices. We know well and good how to deal, parley and live alongside the Fair Folk, but these aliens of your seem to be  so rude as to not even leave a note when they abuse your animals. Poor showing, I can tell you.


#8434    Slave2Fate

Slave2Fate

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 6,414 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:00 PM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 10 March 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:

no Zoser, I think it was done by beings from the Never-Never who were paid with saucers of milk, kind words, promises of future services and the odd swapped child.

You're the one with the preposterous idea it was aliens. We've millennia of history with the Fair Folk. We know they're master builders. Your "aliens" can't even be bothered to show up for a chat with the locals, whereas the Fair Folk are well known in the locale of their edifices. We know well and good how to deal, parley and live alongside the Fair Folk, but these aliens of your seem to be  so rude as to not even leave a note when they abuse your animals. Poor showing, I can tell you.

I don't put much stock in faeries (or any of the wee folk for that matter) however I'd sooner believe it was faeries than aliens. Aliens just don't make one iota of sense.

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#8435    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:09 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 10 March 2013 - 12:00 PM, said:

I don't put much stock in faeries (or any of the wee folk for that matter) however I'd sooner believe it was faeries than aliens. Aliens just don't make one iota of sense.

Universe too small perhaps?

Posted Image


#8436    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:10 PM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 09:00 AM, said:

And the other half a dozen types of moulding phenomena?  Where are they?  The trowel marks, the obvious smoothing, the smudge marks, the pointing, if you would like me to repost them please let me know.

It's this kind of extremely feeble effort that tells me and others no doubt that you have not a hope in hell of coming up with answers.

There are none.

Find examples of the other phenomena if you can.

Preferably on known constructions.

All you have demonstrated is examples of erosion.  Not moulding,


as i said with the bottom pic.. if you were to cut that into a block.. it would look exactly the same as your 'molded' ones..

see things like that do naturally form..

as for how those marks were done.. by using stone and bone tools.. and what is the rock you may ask..

well..the first one.. is sand stone

the second.. nothing but good old west australian granite

did I say granite.. yes I did.. granite that was worked with stone and bone.. and look at that circle.. nicely formed isnt it.. no alien tech used there..

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 08:56 AM, said:

Brilliant Dingo.  Once again you have answered everything the LAH Team and every other AA proponent ever wanted to know.

A shear genius in all respects.

Well done.

:ph34r:

Thank you.. common sense you know.. you dont need to involve fantasy when you can use fact..


#8437    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:11 PM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 10 March 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:

no Zoser, I think it was done by beings from the Never-Never who were paid with saucers of milk, kind words, promises of future services and the odd swapped child.

You're the one with the preposterous idea it was aliens. We've millennia of history with the Fair Folk. We know they're master builders. Your "aliens" can't even be bothered to show up for a chat with the locals, whereas the Fair Folk are well known in the locale of their edifices. We know well and good how to deal, parley and live alongside the Fair Folk, but these aliens of your seem to be  so rude as to not even leave a note when they abuse your animals. Poor showing, I can tell you.

Yep.

Damn rude of them I agree.

Doesn't change the evidence one iota though.

Interesting we are now discussion alien manners.

That's progress.

Posted Image


#8438    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:12 PM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 09:22 AM, said:

Just in case you forgot what the moulding marks look like.

Here they are again.  Absolutely nothing like yours Dingo.

I would add that this is what the skeptics have been doing for 500 pages here now.  Abe did it with his chemicals, Mr O did it with Stocks and Potzen and Seeder does it with the Parthenon.

Your posts are all so easy to refute because you are not comparing the exact phenomena.  Very simple.

You seem to think that if you post anything remotely related that it will answer the problem, fully.

Of course it is not that simple.

The rest of the 500 pages is just shouting, complaining and insults.

Now find if you can phenomena resembling this on known constructions (not erosion, that is easy to detect).

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

and it has been explained to you time and time again.. the ways it could have been done.. and possible ways that are based in fact and science..

what do you come up with .. science fiction..


#8439    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:13 PM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 09:45 AM, said:

Care to post them again or are you just happy to make groundless claims?

Sorry to be blunt, but nothing I have seen resembles the above precision.

Be back in about 10 minutes with some other examples.

why would we need to.. go back through all 560 odd pages.. and look again.. and maybe this time.. actually look..


#8440    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:13 PM

View PostDingoLingo, on 10 March 2013 - 12:10 PM, said:



as i said with the bottom pic.. if you were to cut that into a block.. it would look exactly the same as your 'molded' ones..

see things like that do naturally form..

as for how those marks were done.. by using stone and bone tools.. and what is the rock you may ask..

well..the first one.. is sand stone

the second.. nothing but good old west australian granite

did I say granite.. yes I did.. granite that was worked with stone and bone.. and look at that circle.. nicely formed isnt it.. no alien tech used there..



Thank you.. common sense you know.. you dont need to involve fantasy when you can use fact..

It doesn't do anything for the debate Dingo just producing images of erosion.

The marks I showed you are all over the Cuzco walls.

That's not erosion.  Look back if you wish.  See for yourself.

Again sausages not steak.

http://www.unexplain...15#entry4693647

Posted Image


#8441    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:15 PM

View PostDingoLingo, on 10 March 2013 - 12:12 PM, said:


and it has been explained to you time and time again.. the ways it could have been done.. and possible ways that are based in fact and science..

what do you come up with .. science fiction..

Then how were the marks achieved?

Substantiate your claims please.

Posted Image


#8442    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:16 PM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 11:12 AM, said:

Ancient high technology is a fact and has not been refuted on this thread

Oh pull the other one zoser.. it plays jingle bells..

it has been refuted time and time again on here.. but your just to dense to open your eyes.. the only one here who believes the garbage you throw out is yourself.. and one or two people who semi agree.. not fully agree with you.. but semi..


#8443    Slave2Fate

Slave2Fate

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 6,414 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:16 PM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 12:09 PM, said:

Universe too small perhaps?

On the contrary, much too big. However that is a different argument.

All this time and effort you have put forth and you are still left with only misinterpreted pictures and feeble protests. No offence zoser, but I feel sorry for you.

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#8444    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:17 PM

View Postzoser, on 10 March 2013 - 12:13 PM, said:

It doesn't do anything for the debate Dingo just producing images of erosion.

The marks I showed you are all over the Cuzco walls.

That's not erosion.  Look back if you wish.  See for yourself.

Again sausages not steak.

http://www.unexplain...15#entry4693647

problem is zoser your not even showing steak.. but green eggs and ham..


#8445    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:18 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 10 March 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:

On the contrary, much too big. However that is a different argument.

All this time and effort you have put forth and you are still left with only misinterpreted pictures and feeble protests. No offence zoser, but I feel sorry for you.

Billions of galaxies and potentially trillions of planets.

Evolution and technology far in advance of our own.

Seems high probability to me.

View PostDingoLingo, on 10 March 2013 - 12:17 PM, said:

problem is zoser your not even showing steak.. but green eggs and ham..

Evidence?

:whistle:

Posted Image