TheSearcher, on 14 January 2013 - 09:04 AM, said:
I'll grant that there is some similarity, not sure if it is the same thing though. Are the two part of the exact same culture or not?
I don't see how you get that mathematicians think these are incredible, when only researchers associated with the municipality of Palpa have access to them. If you have any reference to the contrary, please feel free to post it.
As to your "alien" elongated skulls, both Hancock and Foerster got their cues from David Hatcher Childress and he has been proven wrong more often than not. So yes, the nobility of the Paracas culture, practised skull binding, resulting in cranial deformation. However they were not unique in this, as the process was practised by many cultures, at different times, around the world. These other cultures include those in ancient Iraq, Russia, Melanesia, Malta, North America, Mexico, and possibly Egypt during the Amarna period.
I don't remember have wrote "alien skulls" in any of my lines. That would be underestimate an ancient culture like PARACAS. I fact, i'm not a fanatic of the alien theory of von Daniken or CHILDRESS.
would be nice if take a serious look to recent research on the elongated skulls like Paracas ( and other of course , like the Olmecs in Mexico and Tiahunacu in Bolivia). it is true there are many skulls artificially elongated, but a natural elongated skull, differences in three things:
-Largest cranial capacity than a normal human ,
which can not be achieved by any method of artificial deformation.
- two cranial plates instead of three,
-have two little holes for nerves or veins in the back of the cranial bone, no recent human have similar
- The lower jaw in crooked bite,
And, yes ... Japanese and German scientist have made research recently , in "the Palpa SUN AND CROSS STAR" wrong called "MANDALA" glyph.
Edited by javillv34, 14 January 2013 - 09:39 PM.