Watch below... To see how I am right:
http://en.wikipedia....or_shareholders - Bank of America
http://investors.mor...ajor.html?t=HBC - HSBC
http://investors.mor...major.html?t=DB - Deutsche Bank
http://investors.mor...ajor.html?t=BCS - Barclays
Not seeing a Rothy on any of these lists or on the Boards of any of the investment companies or the banks themselves. If you can find one, feel free to point it out. You do realize that, by law, they have to reveal all of this information, right?
Let me guess, though, this is exactly what they want us to believe, right?
But yes, technically, you are probably correct. I'm sure there is a Rothy somewhere in the world that owns stock in some of these big banks and, technically, they do own it (a small piece of it). But, you know what? Then so do I as I have some stock from all of the above listed banks in my portfolio.
Guess I'm "controlling the world" too, huh? Feel free to bow before me and PM me for an address to send all tributes.
I'm going to do it with just your first link and the first share holder to prove my point:
Read right under their logo/name on their website....
Anyway other banks have nothing to do with this, because the fact is it's the link between the government and the central bank of the country, Banks like HSBC and Barcleys etc have nothing to do with central banks and putting our government in debt..
Please enlighten me though, as to why Al Qaeda was supported financially and with air support from the UK and US to take out Gaddafi/Libya and why was a central bank implemented the moment they had taken over? Same with Afghanistan and Iraq.... These are facts that we implemented central banks the moment we had control either ourselves or through "terrorists". The central banks in those 3 examples are owned by the Rothschild's... So please explain to me why that happened and why Al Qaeda allowed it when they run Libya now?