I may have spoken with people with the relevant expertise from both sides of the arguments, but all my points that I argue come from me based on my understanding surrounding the events and collapse of the WTC. Not from the experts!!
I may cite or use them to reference a point, but that is as far as authoritative as my argument gets.
Isn't using the general consensus of experts at JREF appealing to authority by any chance?? lol
No. Argument from authority is no longer valid when 2 conditions are met.
1. Argument made from an expert.
2. General consensus is met.
So, does your few supporters meet the level of general consensus to JREF? Didn't think so....