Nope! First of all, your sources have not provided evidence of explosives, which is a big difference between my sources, who have provided evidence that fire was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings while on the other hand, your sources have yet to provide any evidence of explosives, which is understandable considering that:
* No explosions seen as the WTC buildings collapsed
* No explosions heard as the WTC buildings collapsed
* No explosions detected on seismic monitors in the area as the WTC buildings collapsed
* No explosive hardware found in the rubble of the WTC buildings.
Those facts alone have trashed all of your sources.
Edited by skyeagle409, 24 September 2013 - 12:34 AM.