I wouldn't say they are grossly uninformed because they can clearly disseminate facts when it suits them. It is obvious that denial is the key issue and tactic because it's easier to deny facts rather than having to face the fact that they are wrong. When that doesn't work, they go straight to ignorance and if that fails, they just lie.
So far I have been told by the pantomime debunkers.........
- That thousands of demolition experts who agree with the OCT is actually equal to 3.
Let's take another look.
New Mexico demolitions expert Van Romero said on the day of the attack that he believed the building collapses were "too methodical" to have been a result of the collisions, and that he thought "there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." His remarks were published in the Albuquerque Journal.
Ten days later the same newspaper printed a retraction, in which Romero is quoted as saying "Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail."
Now, where is that evidence that explosives were used?