Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3683 replies to this topic

#1486    Q24

Q24

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,921 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006

Posted 12 April 2013 - 10:49 AM

Typical skyeagle.  A complete diversion from any attempt to defend the initial point - Brent Blanchard’s poor argument (I’ll consider that point unopposed, obvious as it is anyhow) – and a confuddled tangent concerning ‘squibs’.  He doesn’t even know what is referred to when ‘squibs’ are mentioned in regard to the WTC.

Skyeagle, the picture which you posted is not a ‘squib’: -

Posted Image


It is the focused ejections below the collapse front that are ‘squibs’: -

Posted Image

Whilst the official story claims these are pressurized air ejections from the collapsing tower, the isolated, highly focused and generally centre facing location (aligning with large box columns of the tower core structure) suggest they are actually progressive demolition charges designed to carry the collapse to completion.

Operation Northwoods was a 1962 plan by the US Department of Defense to cause acts of violence, blamed on Cuba, in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government. The plan called for various false flag actions, such as staged terrorist attacks and plane hijackings, on U.S. and Cuban soil.

#1487    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 12 April 2013 - 06:08 PM

View PostQ24, on 12 April 2013 - 10:49 AM, said:

Typical skyeagle.  A complete diversion from any attempt to defend the initial point - Brent Blanchard’s poor argument (I’ll consider that point unopposed, obvious as it is anyhow) – and a confuddled tangent concerning ‘squibs’.  He doesn’t even know what is referred to when ‘squibs’ are mentioned in regard to the WTC.

Skyeagle, the picture which you posted is not a ‘squib’: -

Posted Image

That is not the result of explosives. 911 Truthers have claimed the squibs were the result of explosives, but as you can see, the photos refute their claim. Stop the following video at time line 0:06. What do you see as WTC2 collapse? And, what you don't hear as WTC2 collapses is the sound of bomb explosions.



Quote

It is the focused ejections below the collapse front that are ‘squibs’: -

Posted Image

That has nothing to do with explosives. That is compressed air and nothing to do with bombs. Take a syringe and plug the hole. Next, drill a tiny hole on the side, and push the plunger. What happens afterward? You can also drill a small hole on the sidewall of your automobile tire and get the same effect.

Edited by skyeagle409, 12 April 2013 - 06:22 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1488    coolguy

coolguy

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,884 posts
  • Joined:06 Feb 2011

Posted 13 April 2013 - 04:18 AM

The towers where built to with stand plane crashes and not fall.
Somebody was hideing something.
Workers found the black boxs and the government said they where destoryed
Which is bull because the black boxs cant be destoryed

Edited by coolguy, 13 April 2013 - 04:22 AM.


#1489    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 13 April 2013 - 04:52 AM

View Postcoolguy, on 13 April 2013 - 04:18 AM, said:

The towers where built to with stand plane crashes and not fall.
Somebody was hideing something.
Workers found the black boxs and the government said they where destoryed
Which is bull because the black boxs cant be destoryed

The WTC buildings were built to withstand the strike of an airliner, which they did. However, much of the structural loads were redistributed to other columns which lost their fire protection when the aircraft slammed into the buildings and that exposed the steel structures to temperatures high enough to weaken steel. The temperatures  within the buildings did not need to be high enough to melt steel, but just enough to weaken the remaining structures that were now supporting the redistributed structural loads.

To further add, inspections of the structures within the WTC buildings prior to the 911 attacks had found that much of the fire protection was poorly applied, which left much of the steel structures unprotected from fire. The bulges were evidence that fire had weakened the structures and prior to the collapse of WTC7, examinations of its structure had determined that WTC7 was going to collapse as well, and a huge bulge was noticed on WTC7 as well.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1490    frenat

frenat

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,919 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2005

Posted 13 April 2013 - 01:49 PM

View Postcoolguy, on 13 April 2013 - 04:18 AM, said:

Which is bull because the black boxs cant be destoryed

Really?  Can't be destroyed?  You think they're made out of unobtainium?  Funniest thing I've read this week. Thanks for the humor.

-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
-Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
-If I wanted to pay for commercials I couldn't skip I'd sign up for Hulu Plus.
-There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law

#1491    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 14 April 2013 - 12:50 AM

View Postfrenat, on 13 April 2013 - 01:49 PM, said:

Really?  Can't be destroyed?  You think they're made out of unobtainium?  Funniest thing I've read this week. Thanks for the humor.

Simply amazing!!!

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1492    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,063 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008

Posted 14 April 2013 - 09:42 PM

Indeed the commits from the C.T`s in here never cease to amaze ! Did they not See the Two Air Liners hit the buildings?

This is a Work in Progress!

#1493    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,320 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 15 April 2013 - 02:15 PM

What if the planes that hit the towers were not equipped with FDR?


#1494    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 15 April 2013 - 04:08 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 15 April 2013 - 02:15 PM, said:

What if the planes that hit the towers were not equipped with FDR?

There would have been other means to determine what happened. For an example, you have ATC data and even the electronic engine control units can be used to provide useful information.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1495    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,320 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 15 April 2013 - 06:38 PM

What if the ATC data were spoofed and inaccurate and thus invalid?

Clearly there is no engine data, because nobody has provided an engine to examine.  Whatever data it MIGHT provide would be trivial.  The absence of engines provides far more evidence, OF A COVERUP.


#1496    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 15 April 2013 - 07:09 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 15 April 2013 - 06:38 PM, said:

What if the ATC data were spoofed and inaccurate and thus invalid?

Apparently, radar data, FDR data, communication tapes and position reports, eyewitnesses accounts placing the aircraft at specific areas are not evidence of spoofing. Remember, even though the transponder was tampered with on American 77, it was still creating radar returns to the point that ATC requested a C-130 to identify the aircraft, which they later confirmed had crashed into the Pentagon.

Quote

Clearly there is no engine data, because nobody has provided an engine to examine.

Let's take another look.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

Posted Image



Posted Image


Posted Image



Posted Image


Posted Image

Edited by skyeagle409, 15 April 2013 - 07:15 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1497    Q24

Q24

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,921 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006

Posted 17 April 2013 - 08:32 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 12 April 2013 - 06:08 PM, said:

That has nothing to do with explosives. That is compressed air and nothing to do with bombs. Take a syringe and plug the hole. Next, drill a tiny hole on the side, and push the plunger. What happens afterward? You can also drill a small hole on the sidewall of your automobile tire and get the same effect.

Did someone drill a hole on the sidewall of the WTC tower?  Unlike your example, the facade of the WTC towers consisted of many windows/openings across every level.  The result of pressurized air from the collapse would therefore be numerous ejections across/around each level.  The isolated/focussed ejection actually witnessed indicates a focussed/isolated source of air pressure.  A demolition charge fits the bill.  Indeed, you will not find the WTC squib effect in any example of a natural collapse but frequently in that of demolition: -

Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted Image

Operation Northwoods was a 1962 plan by the US Department of Defense to cause acts of violence, blamed on Cuba, in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government. The plan called for various false flag actions, such as staged terrorist attacks and plane hijackings, on U.S. and Cuban soil.

#1498    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 17 April 2013 - 10:00 PM

View PostQ24, on 17 April 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:

Did someone drill a hole on the sidewall of the WTC tower?  Unlike your example, the facade of the WTC towers consisted of many windows/openings across every level.  The result of pressurized air from the collapse would therefore be numerous ejections across/around each level.  The isolated/focussed ejection actually witnessed indicates a focussed/isolated source of air pressure.  A demolition charge fits the bill.  Indeed, you will not find the WTC squib effect in any example of a natural collapse but frequently in that of demolition: -

Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted Image

That area you looped was nothing more than JET of debris which was ejected by compressed air and nothing to do with explosives and you will also notice that as the building collapsed it is forcing compressed air ahead of the collapse. Nothing in that lower photo that even remotely suggest the use of explosives.

It is really simple to understand.



Non-explosive Verinage method


Posted Image


Posted Image


Posted Image

Posted Image


You might want to review this video.



Add to the fact that no evidence of explosives was found at ground zero nor seen or heard on video  and that simply underlines the fact that no explosives of any kind were used. In other words, if you can't provide explosive evidence, you have no case.

Edited by skyeagle409, 17 April 2013 - 10:41 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1499    Q24

Q24

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,921 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006

Posted 17 April 2013 - 10:27 PM

skyeagle...

This is not a squib: -

Posted Image

This is not a squib: -

Posted Image

The images in my previous post(s) are squibs.

At least understand the feature that is discussed.

It's like if I said, "The grass is green", and you said, “No, it is not”: -

Posted Image

See, it doesn't make any sense.

Edit:  and now you have changed the pictures in your post, which still do not show the squibs discussed.

Edited by Q24, 17 April 2013 - 10:28 PM.

Operation Northwoods was a 1962 plan by the US Department of Defense to cause acts of violence, blamed on Cuba, in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government. The plan called for various false flag actions, such as staged terrorist attacks and plane hijackings, on U.S. and Cuban soil.

#1500    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,202 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 17 April 2013 - 10:44 PM

View PostQ24, on 17 April 2013 - 10:27 PM, said:

skyeagle...

This is not a squib: -

Posted Image

This is not a squib: -

Posted Image

The images in my previous post(s) are squibs.

At least understand the feature that is discussed.

It is all very simple; You have yet to provide a shred of evidence that explosives were used at ground zero. You might want to review this link.

Quote



Edited by skyeagle409, 17 April 2013 - 10:47 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX