Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3683 replies to this topic

#3676    flyingswan

flyingswan

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,961 posts
  • Joined:13 Sep 2006

Posted 21 June 2014 - 02:41 PM

View PostW Tell, on 20 June 2014 - 03:58 AM, said:

I was not the one that brought up verticle loads... I only pointed out how they are important. What did I overlook? Swan should have spoken up well before now if he wanted to save face.
Why should I speak up to save your face?  

I'm afraid you still have this problem with not making the effort to read and understand other people's posts.  Sky mentioned the dynamic vertical loads that occurred in the collapse, but you ignored the word "dynamic" and made all sorts of claims based on that mistake.

"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true" - Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
In which case it is fortunate that:
"Science is the best defense against believing what we want to" - Ian Stewart (1945- )

#3677    bendigger0

bendigger0

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 861 posts
  • Joined:17 Jan 2014

Posted 21 June 2014 - 04:40 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 21 June 2014 - 03:51 AM, said:


I have also blamed Rice, our intelligence agencies and even the FAA for dropping the ball...

Dropping the ball is not unique to the United States...

Hitler dropped so many balls...

FBI chief, J. Edgar Hoover, dropped the ball...

The Soviet Union dropped the ball...

Johnson dropped the ball...

Nixon dropped the ball.

Dropping the ball is nothing new and unfortunately...

dropping the ball will continue...

SKY >>> you are HILARIOUS !   I haven't seen so many "dropped balls" since the NY METS inaugural season.   Is "damage control" a euphemism for "lie"?  Now if only Bush, Rice, and Rumsfeld would "I'm sorry..."  Everything would be alright... :no:

Edited by bendigger0, 21 June 2014 - 04:41 PM.


#3678    stereologist

stereologist

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,806 posts
  • Joined:08 Sep 2009

Posted 21 June 2014 - 06:04 PM

View PostW Tell, on 20 June 2014 - 03:35 AM, said:

What else do you want to call it... an accident?

.I don't think I've ever seen any kind of conformation of this claim, but please post it. I'm interested.

That's Newton. Not us. Argue with a dead man.

It was a collapse.

As far as the dust goes you are simply repeating truther nonsense without knowing anything about the issue.
http://pubs.usgs.gov...29/results.html

Quote

The results of analyses completed so far show a consistent picture: the samples are largely composed of gypsum, cellulose, and miscellaneous materials common in a building, with minor asbestiform minerals.

Here is an analysis of the dust.
http://www.911myths....omposition.html

http://archive.org/s...JDedit_djvu.txt

Quote

What materials were present in the initial dust/smoke? Gypsum (major component of drywall
Concrete dust (cement dust, crystalline silica)
Glass fragments and man-made vitreous fibers
Asbestos
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's)
Metals (hexavalent chromium, nickel, arsenic)
Volatile organic compounds (benzene)

http://www.mvainc.co...t-particles”/
http://www.scientifi.../wtc-dust.html#
http://wtcreflection...lg.com/science/
http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov/wtc/sem1/

As far as Newton goes you're wrong. The notion of least resistance is a truther nonsense. New ton states nothing of the sort. You need to go back and learn what Newtons laws are and what they mean.


#3679    stereologist

stereologist

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,806 posts
  • Joined:08 Sep 2009

Posted 21 June 2014 - 06:06 PM

View PostW Tell, on 20 June 2014 - 03:58 AM, said:

I was not the one that brought up verticle loads... I only pointed out how they are important. What did I overlook? Swan should have spoken up well before now if he wanted to save face.

Maybe Flying Swan was stepping by your childish comment.


#3680    stereologist

stereologist

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,806 posts
  • Joined:08 Sep 2009

Posted 21 June 2014 - 06:08 PM

View PostW Tell, on 20 June 2014 - 04:05 AM, said:

And according to Einstein... he is to. But... they "are the natural laws" that work with reality. Once again... argue with a dead man

  Yes.

  Toilet paper offers no resistance to a brick.

Again your comments are inane and show that you know nothing whatsoever about Newton's laws.

There is no physics law about taking the path of least resistance. It's all about least energy.

PS you are wrong about the toilet paper and the brick.


#3681    stereologist

stereologist

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,806 posts
  • Joined:08 Sep 2009

Posted 21 June 2014 - 06:11 PM

View PostW Tell, on 20 June 2014 - 05:31 AM, said:

"Do bullets follow the path of least resistance?"

There's you're question.  Any body want to step up and say no?
The simple answer is NO. You simply have no idea what you are talking about, which is obvious from all of your posts.


#3682    RaptorBites

RaptorBites

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,208 posts
  • Joined:12 Jan 2012

Posted 21 June 2014 - 06:19 PM

View Poststereologist, on 21 June 2014 - 06:08 PM, said:

PS you are wrong about the toilet paper and the brick.

Noticed how he dodged such a simple question requiring only a simple answer.

It is clear he showed less than a menial understanding of basic physics and reason why he continues to be wrong on such matters.



No, you surround yourself with a whole different kettle of crazy. - Sir Wearer of Hats

#3683    stereologist

stereologist

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,806 posts
  • Joined:08 Sep 2009

Posted 21 June 2014 - 06:20 PM

View Postbendigger0, on 21 June 2014 - 04:40 PM, said:

SKY >>> you are HILARIOUS !   I haven't seen so many "dropped balls" since the NY METS inaugural season.   Is "damage control" a euphemism for "lie"?  Now if only Bush, Rice, and Rumsfeld would "I'm sorry..."  Everything would be alright... :no:

Do you have anything other than innuendos to post? You've posted nothing of interest so far.


#3684    Saru

Saru

    Site Webmaster

  • 20,230 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001

Posted 21 June 2014 - 07:08 PM

As this thread seems to have degenerated in to almost nothing but derogatory personal remarks and given that the topic's size is creating slowdowns and is taking way too much time to load up I think it's time for a refresh on this particular subject.

Feel free to begin a new thread - this one has run its course.

Closed.