Not sure what point you falsely believe I fail to grasp – certainly nothing which you mention. The absolutely reasonable point remains, that the case where NIST simulated possibility of collapse initiation (not forgetting those additional manual inputs) exceeded both the best estimates of aircraft impact and building and most importantly the damage actually observed on 9/11 (you neglect to mention that most important fact in your comment). This is a problem because not only does it present the unfavorable odds noted for the official collapse theory, but it demonstrates that NIST based their collapse theory on a fantasy/hypothetical case, not within the boundaries of reality that were present on 9/11. Nothing you say nor speculate can alter this.
Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.
WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken
3683 replies to this topic